[ARCHIVE]Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Can't go anywhere without you - 5. - page 253
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
By the way, they don't. Oscillatory indulators, on the contrary, usually give outperforming signals. The problem is that 50% of them are false.)
Well, 50% without them is just like without anything, so what for do we need them! My Expert Advisor calculates the quote itself without indicators and solves 65% of trades, the rest is done by MM, trawl, SL and TP, and it closes 80% of trades in profit. :))
I don't use them either, they are 50% without them, so what for do we need them? My Expert Advisor checks the quote itself without indicators and releases 65% of trades, the rest is done by MM, trawl, SL and TP and 80% of trades are closed in profit. :))
Boris, who told you I was the one talking about oscillators?
And, by the way, I wouldn't raise this question here, but there are pro traders I know who use oscillators, only on TFs from one hour and above, and not in the same way as everyone else, but in their own way. I do not use them myself, since they are not my approach.
This is the first time I've seen such a design:
Why do that? When will the cycle be over? And how does the expert know that TRU?
This is the first time I've seen such a design:
Why do that? When will the cycle be over? And how does the expert know that TRU?
if it is a dynamic parameter, why not ?
As long as the price ratio to Winnie the Pooh's ears is correct....
if it's a dynamic parameter, why not ?
As long as the ratio of price to Winnie the Pooh's ears is correct....
What does this have to do with a dynamic parameter? The conditions are essentially all dynamic to some degree. If one is, the other is.
But if a condition is given, if the variable is so-and-so equals so-and-so... then... do something, or if there is so-and-so, then do so-and-so, then everything makes sense.
But here:
Where did the TRU come from ?What does this have to do with the dynamic parameter? The conditions are essentially all dynamic to some degree. If one is, the other is.
But if a condition is given, if a variable is so-and-so, equals so-and-so, or if there is so-and-so, we do so-and-so, then it makes sense.
But here:
Where did the TRU come from ?Usually such a construction is used when there are many different conditions on which a loop has to be completed, but their execution is non-deterministic.
Example to illustrate the logic: I want the program to make dough indefinitely (i.e. while(true) - the condition is always true), but also to stop if a) I'm bursting from eating black caviar, b) I fly to Mars, c) I crash the world markets (in which case we put break).
This may be rewritten differently, for example, for(;;), which is equivalent to while(true). Or you can put all the stopping conditions directly into while(i.e., here), but it is inconvenient when there are a lot of conditions and they branch.
Folks, previously in the editor when you hover over a reserved word and press f1 a window would open at the bottom with a description of the function, now I don't have this. What could be the problem ?
You don't just hover, you click on the word, and in the middle)
you don't just point, but click on the word, and in the middle)
without getting into a discussion of what and where to click, I'll put it simply - it used to work and now it doesn't. has anyone experienced this ?