Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 580
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Fundamental robot we have) is ridiculous bullshit. More often than not, analysts and insiders are trying illusions.
Regarding the answer to your question with volatility and volumes. This order system works better on pullbacks after trends (on trends in the other direction). The pivot points are very accurate, 9 out of 10 are true. I trade by them manually. I use the parameter potential of the current movement, which is calculated on the basis of the market movement. And it will be either right away or in 100 points maximum. Why do not fix the loss? The order system compensates for losses. There is no martin, no averaging, and no oversleeping. The whole order system is looped.
Almost a grail, but not ideal. One has to manage to lose money on it. They have abandoned the trading robot because the risks/profits cannot be increased proportionally. To put it simply, it may not yield more than 10-15 percent a month, with drawdown below 20 percent.
There is always that balance. Either you sacrifice profits to neutralize losses and get few signals. Or you overestimate risks and catch unnecessary flops and drawdown on them.
I wrote it out recently. The robot uses 10 market patterns. It's still not perfect... There's something missing there that gets it to the grail.
"The robot uses the effect of time-dependent price movements. It calculates the probability of a reversal and, at the point of maximum probability, opens and independently escorts trades."
And how can this stratum be broken? How is it the easiest to lose?
The reversal did not take place in the calculated point that was far away and immediately. What will he do? To average? Will he close the loss at once? Or leave the drawdown and use other symbols to reach the drawdown? What are the other options? Ah,a lock).
And Genghis - neither option will work. It will. If you don't refill. And it depends on the amount... There will be a point of no return, when the fraction no longer makes sense: either the maximum on the transactions reached, or the amount of the fraction not affordable).
Well, if you take a breakdown, for example. Or if you swing with small lots. So there is both flat and swaps. I don't know.
What kind of robot do you have, how do you expect to bring it down?
First of all, the probability of reversal as an independent event cannot be determined. Because it's an event that hasn't happened yet. And whoever is doing this is wasting time on a perfect apotheosis in its purest form.
The only thing that can be determined is the probability of continuation of the directional movement. But to do it one has to determine it best by the price itself and nothing more.
Secondly, it is very easy to "sink" - a pull-down of 500-800 points and a drawdown in half an hour, and a very large drawdown in a fairly short period of time.
The easiest way to lose is to, absurd as it may sound... Opening on it during a flat, there is the highest probability of failure, because all trends are born out of a flat. \
It may seem to some people that the probability of a reversal is 1 minus the probability of a trend. But this is farooooo wrong. because there is a correction, which is essentially / trend - random wandering - trend / . And a reversal is also a trend, but in the opposite direction.
Then one minus the probability of trend continuation is the probability of a flat and nothing more.
No, sir, you havedeversification. And it's definitely making a profit, around 60%.
If it was, I would have used diversification first. Take it apart, figure out how it works and build it again.
But diversification has too many options. In a really working system, the principle on which it is based should have at most 2-4 variants. For example up, down, more, less etc.
And it must be very simple. So much so, that there is nothing else to do but to make money.
For a system that actually works, the principle on which it is based should have a maximum of 2-4 possibilities. For example, up, down, over, under and into the factory.
And it must be very simple. So much so that there is nothing else to do but to make money. At least as in the last option.
A bit of an addition to your thesis Sensei.
We are not satisfied with this robot in terms of profit/loss ratio. And in the market it is one of the best jobs.
They offer to check it in the tester, but before that the other one proves that the tester is rubbish. )))
The salesmen are great. One posts, the other advertises. Offers to test in a tester, but before doing so the other proves that the tester is rubbish. )))
We do not sell anything to anybody. I don't need it. I have everything I need to trade. Why should I have to sell anything?
Tell us more about how you see forex and what place do you occupy in it? What is your business in this market? Apart from programming and selling some of my work.
Tell us more about how you see forex and what place do you occupy in it? What is your business in this market? Apart from programming and the partial sale of my own work.
CHINGIZ MUSTAFAEV:
...
You equate it to a casino, fine. Then you say casinos should be played with people who are licensed to do so. Norm. Also, in order to win a lot of money, you have to rip it up in large sums, otherwise there's no point in gambling. If you get the jackpot, you have to pay the tax, but if you get it legally, you have to pay the tax. Gut, fershtein.
At the exchange, two parties make a deal, for a specific purpose. The rest, sand castles.
You can buy the cache, then sell for a better deal if your plan works out and you know the insider. So you can do it beforehand. And to have large sums so that 5% of the difference will be in your pocket.
After reading you, I realized that you do not make any money on it - why would I say that? All of your posts have no idea how to make money, including your description of your robot by yourself. You wrote about a narrow slot, where you have to fly in and stuff, from a distance of 1 km. Well, it's certainly an interesting approach, but if it's a narrow slot, you'd better fly in alone - others won't fit in.
After reading you, I realised that you don't make any money from it yourself.
;)