Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 568
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
not
How not? Closing the buy is a sell, but the price will go up? What is the news?
How is it not? Closing the buy is a sell, but the price will go up? What's the news?
He thinks the price goes up while you hold the buy. like the puppet sees how many people want to take a profit on the buy and therefore does not let the price go there, and then just takes out the stops and goes to sell from the highs.
in my opinion not a multiple unfortunately. A volume of 100500 can go through almost overnight (you bought part of the cup), or "drop by drop" over the course of an hour.
In both cases, the volume is the same, the difference for the owner is the average final price, and in the movement of quotes for all others.
Even the resulting quote will be different. In theory, both results will converge somewhere in the future, but everything will change during this time :-)
well, there are differences
almost a multiple, let's say
How is it not? Closing the buy is a sell, but the price will go up? What is the news?
Underlined is correct.
The dummy sees how many people are willing to take a profit on the buy, so it does not let the price go there, and then just takes out stops and goes to sell from the highs.
i see the same thing in the tester - the price takes a stop... "the Puppet has swallowed the tester and is gobbling up the virtual profit" ! :-)
I already wrote recently: everything is much simpler - the density of events as a result of history analysis follows the growth of "volatility" (volatility?).
With a sharp increase it starts to perform all sorts of miracles, such as stop loss, false breakdowns, wrong signals, etc. Even just by time - just look at "when stops are taken out or bad deals are opened" - there is a fairly typical distribution.
The word "volatility" is in quotes, because it's not really ATR, but its cause. And it's not very clear how to count it...
underlined is correct
:-) In the tester, the same thing happens - the price takes a stop... "the puppet swallowed the tester and eats the virtual profit" ! :-)
I already wrote recently: everything is much simpler - the density of events as a result of history analysis follows the growth of "volatility" (volatility?).
With a sharp increase it starts to perform all sorts of miracles, such as stop loss, false breakdowns, wrong signals, etc. Even just by time - just look at "when stops are taken out or bad deals are opened" - there is a fairly typical distribution.
The word "volatility" is in quotes, because it's not really ATR, but its cause. And it's not very clear how to count it...
I guess I completely agree with the statement. especially about volatility. I am being sarcastic about the "doll-a" ))
And are there any pruphs?
black swan on the pound in the forecasts thread
the day before it was also publishing volumes, purchases could not be counted
other pairs did not shake (including a spoof on the pair trading)
black swan on the pound in the forecasts thread
the day before it was also publishing volumes, buying was uncountable.
other pairs did not shake (including a spoof on the pair trading)
Very constructive.
What particular data are we talking about? My guess is that there's a sanction of retail traders out there.
In any case it's not correct to say that the price falls on buying. Of course it falls on sales, it's just that no one monitors these sales on the mybook.
Very constructive.
What kind of data are we talking about exactly? My guess is that there is a range of retail traders out there.
In any case, it is not correct to say that the price falls on purchases. Of course it falls on sales, it's just that no one monitors these sales on the mybook.