Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 528
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
@Anatolii Zainchkovskii
What's the point of adding to the signal? even if you take it to the sky - 99% drawdown will discourage anyone from subscribing
i think a new signal should have been made if there was (probably) a mistake with something at the start of this one
is this the one for $10,000 ?
I have a prediction and it's ruling so far:
Forum on Trading, Automated Trading Systems and Strategy Testing
Not the Grail, just a regular guy - Bablokos!
Renat Akhtyamov, 2020.05.17 07:44
this is something
at least four lines, not one ;)
They may be used to put some money in the Forex market, but they may be used for other purposes.
just do not run it on the real.
it looks like the signal is formed when the lines cross
so it's dough, but not in favor of the trader, but vice versa
----
no one will ever pay for an idea
you need practice reflected in the stats, long-term monitoring
---
about the relevance of the offer until monday
work on monday?
;)
@Anatolii Zainchkovskii
what's the point of adding to the signal? even if you take it to the sky - 99% drawdown will discourage anyone from subscribing
it seems to me it was necessary to make a new signal, since (probably) there was a mistake with something at the start of this one
You are right, there will be no subscribers at such a drawdown. Do I really need them?
Well if the start has failed due to an error and the grail is a grail, then no, and if the grail is not a grail, there won't be any...
So in both cases you don't need it )
What's the signal for then?
is this the one for $10,000 ?
the prediction was, and it's still going strong:
predicting a flush isn't a tricky business - most people will flush, no matter how you look at it.
you're going to be wrong on a forecast - I'm guessing you're going to be wrong in inverse proportion to the number of times
It's not hard to make predictions on a flush - most people will flush, no matter how you look at it.
guess what, you'll be wrong about the pour prediction in inverse proportion to the number of times
I haven't seen any on the pour yet.
;)
I haven't seen any pouring in here yet
;)
and in 99.999999999999999% of cases you won't see it until it happens )
so predicting a discharge is like stating the fact that the water is wet
and 99.999999999999999% of the time, you won't see it until it's a fait accompli.)
so predicting a drawdown is the same as stating the fact that the water is wet
the signal on the crossing of the lines will unambiguously lead to a flush
this prediction is 100% certain
a signal on crossing the lines will definitely lead to a loss
this prediction is 100% certain
you're about to get stoned, they'll declare you a prophet ))))
and then you're gonna get stoned, as usual.
a signal on crossing the lines will definitely lead to a loss
this prediction is 100%.
dead end again?)
A new deadlock is a new grail?)
Each new dose is the beginning of the next?)