Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 481
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
is this what pair trading is all about?
I mean, the ones that "don't"
no.
the ones that are yes! you have to level the legs in terms of volume in the money.
whether the paired one works - I didn't say anything about that.
...
and to trade these pairs equal in volume is tantamount to trading their cross.
you can set different lots.
for example, based on the volatility of these instruments.
and anyway, who says that lots for two legs should be chosen so that it matches their cross.
you can set different lots.
For example, based on the volatility of these instruments.
It's not just volatility that needs to be taken into account, but also the point value.
Not only volatility has to be taken into account, but also the point value.
Yes, or else the volatility charts will be the same, but a 1 pip movement on the first and second chart will give different results.
Yes, or else the charts will be the same in terms of volatility, but a 1 point movement on the first and second chart will give different results.
He does not know from whence came his "best online casino", a system of bets, and so on and so forth. So many ideas already ponakilala and agree with you from his posts always reeks of trailblazing innovation =)))
Do not get mad and swear at each other! If you need money here and now and you resent not being told where it is, that's fine! Anything that comes easy, goes just as easily.
Comrades! But you should not fall back on@Aleksander with his original approach to series probabilities. That is, after a certain fallen series, the dynamic probability of falling out some of the next series increases. I understand that it's boring to sit down and check this proposition, assumption, whatever you want to call it. About change of signs of differences of modules of increments he too govarival on initial pages of a theme, that too not especially began to untwist this in my opinion phenomenal fact. Have brushed aside as it pesky a fly. At least a couple of people checked it and came to the initially correct conclusion that this change of signs is achieved mostly by a large variant of possible series dropouts. But it was also written there that the series length could be increased from 3, to 4.5, etc. And there you can find interesting anomalies (I pinned pictures a few pages earlier), if you add to this 1st virtual transaction, and maybe even the second, and see what series left on the likely fallout, then you get a great picture. And if you also look at distribution statistics after a minus or plus sign change, well, no one will just tell you how to make money playing numbers. What to do? Check!!! Even if it turns out to be a wrong hypothesis at first, do not give up check for possible errors, very much thrown out because there is a trivial error in the calculations, even more thrown out when we can not look at a result from a different angle.
He did not understand from what times flew with his "best online casino", a system of bets, and so on and so forth. So many ideas plucked and agree with you from his posts always smells like a brave innovation =)))
Do not get mad and swear at each other! If you need money here and now and you resent not being told where it is, that's fine! Anything that comes easy, goes just as easily.
Just an answer for you. I'm not against anyone here) I'm gaining experience myself.
So: check all hypotheses, only on the demo)) If you've earned something by trading, you may check it right away.
If you've earned something with your trading, you may check it on the real account. It's long, but all by itself).
and to trade these pairs equal in volume is tantamount to trading their cross.