Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 235
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
These are not pairs, but sets of pairs... 4 instruments in each of the 6 spreads shown in the figure (I just call them equity). The 2 top channels are taken into account. For example EURGBPAUDNZD and EURNZDCADJPY. They are set in channels at the expense of lots. We take into consideration how these "spreads" behaved before entering the artificial channel
2Joker: You don't take the periods (channel lengths) from scratch, do you?
I am watching the Joker trades. The channel is more or less stationary in the past - around 2 weeks.
The main problem is that the work is not going inside the channel (to the Mach).
Just the opposite - deals at breakdown of the channel.
The lots are also non-standard. If we take beta-neutrality as a criterion, they should differ 2-2.5 times.
They may be 7-10 times that much.
Then there is the thought process ... (or lack thereof:).
Write down your ideas, we will think about it.
the principles of entry/exit are not very clear
Gentlemen, don't try to make money 'here and now', there are economic cycles, stick to them!
О!
I have it by chance, but the trades are still in the market ( not closed ):
1st 4 trades - the one with comment p8, 2nd 4 - the one with comment p4, closed with a loss
1st is -438.06, 2nd is -477.49
only the 3rd four trades p22 turned to profit...
Maybe just a stop at minus $400-something?
the principles of entry/exit are not very clear
It's very simple - look at the synthetic chart and if after watching it you get the feeling that it will grow - then buy it
:)
The only thing left is to program this feeling into the owl.
:)
The only thing left to do is to program that feeling into the owl.
)))))
the principles of entry/exit are not very clear
The only option I have so far (if by Joker), which was mentioned earlier, is a re-break after the channel boundary returns.
The channel boundary is a RMS or 1.5 RMS or 2 RMS etc. Generally, it is a parameter for an EA.
The lots that differ by several times can be given by the regression or by the optimal variant according to ISC. The optimization period is also a parameter for the Expert Advisor.
The question is exactly what kind of stopper it has? Intellectual or a simple return to the MA. Profit - double border with trailing edge (for example).
All of the above can be more or less enquired into.
Filtration of synthetics (this is the most basic and unclear - without it everything would be bad) - I am still only looking at Joker's picture.
I have a lot of questions on this point so far and options too. Ask away:)
Even if they tell you everything, it will still help a maximum of 1% of sufferers:)
The only option I have so far (if by Joker), which was mentioned earlier, is a re-break after the channel boundary returns.
The channel boundary is a RMS or 1.5 RMS or 2 RMS, etc. Generally, it is a parameter for an EA.
The lots that differ by several times can be given by the regression or by the optimal variant according to ISC. The optimization period is also a parameter for the Expert Advisor.
The question is exactly what kind of stopper it has? Intellectual or a simple return to the MA. Profit - double border with trailing edge (for example).
Everything that is higher can be more or less requested.
Filtration of synthetics (it is the most basic and unclear - everything will be bad without it) - I am just looking at Joker's picture so far.
I have a lot of questions on this point and a lot of options, too. Ask away:)
Here, even if they tell you everything, will still help a maximum of 1% of those who suffer:).
not so... a re-break after not crossing the middle of the channel
it is not even a problem to go through all 35 fours with any possible lot increments for each pair (within 0.1 or 0.01 lots) and do it every hour, for example
and without any shamanism like cointegration
and filter out the fours that have been hanging out in the channel for 2 weeks with the minimum width
but I'm afraid there will be "false" quadruples among them, which just happened to appear as a result of minimal variance optimization
and the problem of uncertainty of inputs is not solved by this approach anyway
I can only assume that it enters when the possible TP to SL becomes more than 2:1, and it counts on leaving the channel in a strictly defined direction
What he said is where the spread goes into the channel, it will go out the same way.
it means we need to extend the spread chart to the past and see where it entered the channel
He's probably using that as the basis for his stops.
This can be seen on the equity line if you draw a pair of fours on the equity charts
)))))