You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You are not a stupid man. But you have said a rare foolishness. I am not aiming to show an increase in balance here.
Hello, come to the Christmas tree.
What else don't we know about why you're here?
... You don't understand how fast a step function grows. ...
And I asked about the ratio of profitable to losing trades for a reason. My intuition told me that the profitable ones will be somewhere around 66.6%. Why - I do not know myself.
Obama's campaign anthem... the song "Yes We Can" in reverse... will be heard Thank You Satan. https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=jqALdkTArqsdaughter's name isNatasha. Backwards is Ah Satan. The Apocalypse from Elijah: One of the signs of the Beast will be a white gray spot on his head. Obama's official website in Russia http://www.barackobama.ru/fotoThe third photo above clearly shows the gray spot .The Bible says that the Beast will come as a man of peace. Indeed, immediately after the inauguration the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded. The woman priest and pederast priest who blessed Obama at the inaugurationare rejected by God HOWEVER .Luke's Gospel says "I saw Satan sleeping like lightning from heaven". So "lightning from heaven" is Hebrew: "barak o bama...
... And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have not yet received the kingdom, but shall take power with the beast as kings for one hour .The transformation of the G7 into the G20 before our eyes will yield the required number 10, if we subtract the geopolitical enemies of the West, Russia and China, as well asthe European Union, a fictitious structure that duplicates the real countries. Ten countries, which previously played no role in the world power ("have not yet received the kingdom"), with the beginning of the apocalyptic period joinedthe expanded Western structure along with the former G7 and were allowed to manage financial flows, and with them to rule the world ("will take power with the beast, like kings"), but their stay in this role, given the fragility of the current geopolitical structure of the West in general, is obviously not long ("for one hour") .
The beast will rule for 3.5 years... Then Armageddon will begin. You can rest assured, Armageddon - the final battle around Jerusalem will begin on time, just after 3.5 years of rule, on July 20, the US will attack Iran, Iran will attack Israel .Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Iran are just steps towards the Armageddon that theChristian fanatics around President J. Bush Jr. have been so fond of ranting about .J. Bush Jr. even said "God ordered me to attack Iraq - and I did" (c).Armageddon, as predicted, will last 5 months .Right up to December 21, 2012.
And why there's a theoretical 66.6% probability... because that's why on roulette the sum of the numbers is 666 :-)
But said a rare foolishness. I'm not aiming to show an increase in balance here.
He's an MM. His probability of a losing trade is 0.4 (according to the demo account). To withdraw half of 10000 he must make 5000/50=100 losing trades in a row.
And the probability of this event is 0.4^100=1.6*10E-40.
Taking into account that he executes 8.4 trades per day on average - 3066 trades per year. So the probability of losing half of his account in a year is very small.
But, if he did not keep MM, then, for example, at lot = 2, he would need to make only 5 losing trades in a row.
And probability of this event = 0.4^5= 0.01. Consequently, he would lose 3066*0.01=30 times in a year.
Let the mathematicians correct me if I am wrong.
You are wrong. I'm not thinking about money management or balance sheet growth as evidence at all. I'm demonstrating a preponderance of probability. Increase the number of trades by 10 times and lot by three and show 30 times more profit - not the point. The idea is not the point. You can lose half in many ways, not just "100 losing trades in a row". But also "99 losses in a row, 1 profit, 2 losses". And an unrealistically large number of them. So the probability of such an event is many orders of magnitude greater than the one you calculated. It's still a long shot, though.
"I always translate scientific articles from the pindonese and take great pleasure in the "weobservers" part. What do you want? "Was observed" is in the Germanic tradition, impersonal, but here it's an active life position. I retain the emotional colouring.
On a random walk graph, what would your system's results be?
I don't like that equity at all. I don't understand what all the fuss is about. I don't even know what all the fuss is about. I've always thrown such strategists in my trash.
Can you give a specific formula for calculating this probability?