Help me write an EA, thanks in advance - page 23
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
---------------------------------------------------------------------------1.2550 profit from bai and stop from sells here
--------------------------------------------------------------------------1.2500 бай 0.01/0.04
-------------------------------------------------------------------------.1.2480 сел 0.02
------------------------------------------------------------------------1.2430 stops from bays and profits from sells here
so maybe you can see better? i have not open more than 4 orders, and how long may the price stay in one place? not very long )) because i have to walk
Your bicycle was invented a long time ago and has been studied from all sides, see the branch Avalanche, (by the way, there are also EAs). If you don't use the analysis, this EA will eventually sell out. If we use thechanalysis for entry and limit the number of knees, then in principle it may work profitably, though with a rather large drawdown.
Here are the results of testing one of the variants of such a TS: starting lot 0.05, maximal lot 1.95, maximal number of open positions - 5.
Schedule:
Graph:
An avalanche, yes. So? The code is similar, even more primitive: there is no check of maximum lot, min. lot step, distance of stops and traps from price and other.
You should test an avalanche on all ticks by the way, then its disadvantages will be seen in the full glory ;-)
An avalanche, yes. So? The only programmer who posted his code here followed in the footsteps of other avalanche writers. The code is similar, even more primitive: there is no check of maximum lot, min. lot step, distance of stops and stops to price and so on.
You should test an avalanche by all ticks, by the way; then its disadvantages will be clearly seen ;-)
If you know that an avalanche can be tested not only on M1, but surely on all ticks, the result will be the same on M5 as on H1 if the algorithm is programmed correctly)))
Moreover, even artificial tester ticks are more accurate than the opening prices or the more so the check points. Moreover, if an EA is working tickwise, it would be a big mistake to test it at open prices, it is only to mislead someone or to make nice reports )))
If you know that an avalanche can be tested not only on M1, but surely on all ticks, the result will be the same on M5 as on H1 if the algorithm is programmed correctly)))
Moreover, even artificial tester ticks are more accurate than the opening prices or the more so the check points. Moreover, if an EA is working tickwise, it would be a great mistake to test it by opening prices, it can only mislead someone or make nice reports))
I did not feel lazy and ran it on ticks. The difference is not essential. But time consumption for testing is very significant. The difference may be considerable if we use scalping. But in this case profits are from 10 to 65 pips and stops can only trigger in an emergency.
khorosh:
Не поленился, прогнал по тикам. Разница не существенная. Но затрата времени на тестирование очень существенная. Разница может быть существенная, если используется пипсовка. Но в данном случае профиты от 10 до 65 пунктов, а стопы могут сработать только в аварийном случае.
Did you test the author's self-made device or is there such an advisor in kodobase? I would like a more recent test, 2009 is not really relevant.
Hello all, I tried an avalanche, it is not what I said, it does everything to drain the deposit, there widens each successive order corridor instead of narrowing and go into breakeven on a long flat and start over again, so the profit may not see a user because moving away the order and the profit is moved away, in short, a complete sinker