[ARCHIVE!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Can't go anywhere without you - 4. - page 187
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hi all. My history search doesn't return the volume of lots. Is this the way to do it?
It returns the lot 0.1, although lots are changed by the program. tickets are displayed correctly (change). a bug? a bug?Hi all. My history search doesn't return the volume of lots. Is this the way it's supposed to be?
It returns 0.1 lots, although lots are changed by the program. Tickets are reflected correctly (changed).Don't look for "bugs and features" in everything - sometimes the door opens very simply ... :-)
Where's the order loop?
Hi all. My history search doesn't return the volume of lots. Is this the way to do it?
It returns the lot 0.1, although lots are changed by the program. tickets are displayed correctly (change). a bug? a bug?See code analogue, edit, try:
Roman
I don't need a cycle. I need to get the LOT of the last order, no matter which one, I don't need filtering. There is nothing about LOT in the example. I am puzzled.
Roman
I don't need a cycle. I need to get the LOT of the last order, no matter which one, I don't need filtering. There is nothing about LOT in the example. I am puzzled.
Have a look - I've made edits to my previous post...
I don't get it. A loop is needed when you need to filter by some criteria, like in your case. My task is simpler - to take the last order from the history. By definition, it's closed, and by definition, there are no open positions in the market. Tickets are returned correctly, lots are not.
Own! Learn to use the search! :-)
Thanks for wanting to help. I put if (D_sig==0) { command for signal ; }. "Steps" became less, but still they are there. And it is not clear how they are formed.
I put MathAbs in order to have a "corridor" for comparison, because the probability that the signal lines will be absolutely equal is negligibly small.
Maybe someone else has thoughts on my problem?
I wrote it like this and it displays D_Sig in the comment.