[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 409
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I wonder what the criteria are? Zero overlap?
Zero at the very least. The balance picture shows that even at + everything is closed
What if we always close not the total profit, but only the first and the last overlapping positions?
And what was the volume build-up multiplier in this case? And what was the starting lot.
123456
0.1
Still, I don't see any loss minimisation yet. Positions do not build up further, yes, because they are locked in. But the losing wad also goes further into deficit, don't forget. And that means the take to close it in b/o remains farther and farther away.
In other words, why to increase the lots, if we can do nothing and save on spreads. We won't see any profit from lots anyway.)
123456
0.1
So an arithmetic progression? 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 ?
In this case of course it takes even longer to get to zero. The b/w level here is closer at first (in proportion), then moves further and further away.
But it is safer to close the position after the rally.
I.e. Arithmetic progression? 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 ?
In this case, of course, it takes even longer to get to zero. The b/w level here is closer at first (in proportion), then moves away. Although it's safer the other way round to close during the rally.
Yes 0.1, 0.2, 0.3
It is also possible to close with a slight drawback in a flat movement. In case of a drawdown in an obvious trend on the illan, put TP of -30 or -60 depending on the situation. Thereby reducing the probable loss of the entire deposit by a small minus
Yes 0.1, 0.2, 0.3
It is also possible to close with a slight minus in a no return movement. In case of a drawdown in an obvious trend on the illan, put TP of -30 or -60 depending on the situation. Thereby reducing a probable loss of the entire deposit by a small minus
I'm saying the same thing but in a different way. Close the set in minus, but tolerable for the depo.