[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 406

New comment
 
TEXX:

If the price goes lower, we start a partial closing of Avalanche orders, if there is a reversal in our direction, we close the row without a bailout.

I was thinking the same thing. Only in this case it will be not an Avalanche but a simple gradual transfer of losses to the balance (we start closing from long positions).
 
TEXX:

It does not make sense to open more buy and sell, in fact the situation boils down to a simple locking of buy orders, partially or fully,

and then it's better to work with one lock order. I suggest a slightly different approach to deal with it. If the price goes down,

then we start partial closing of Avalanche orders, and if the price reverses in our direction, then we close the bed for no profit.


And we should start with the most minus order and then decrease...
 
OnGoing:
I was thinking the same thing. Only it's not going to be an Avalanche, but rather a simple gradual transfer of losses to the balance (we start to cover long positions).


Let's say a fractional avalanche, but it will allow the deposit to float. We cover the loss with the same profit, so it's more like a leveling off

deposit.

 
TEXX:

Let's say a Fractional LAVIN, but it will allow the deposit to float.

Not really) Because some of the closed positions are no longer in action, it is a fixed loss, and therefore you cannot use them, only the remaining ones. And then we only have to grow a new grid.

This is more an exit with minimal losses than a new one that implies at least break-even.

 
OnGoing:

Not really) Because some of the closed positions are no longer in work, it is a fixed loss, and therefore you cannot use them, only the remaining ones. And then grow a new grid.

This is a way out with the least losses, rather than floating out, implying at least break-even.

If we go further down, then we close the village by TP and close the first losing point by SL, respectively, by picking up

we get buy -450 and sell +500, let's go down further.... :)))) and raise the buy :)))

 
TEXX:

If we go further down, then we close the sit on the TP and close the first losing point on the SL, respectively, by picking up

volumes we get buy -450 and sell +500, let's go further.... :))))

And if we already changed our mind about falling and start pulling back?) Again, it all comes down to a straw that you don't know where to put it)
 
OnGoing:
And if the fall has already changed your mind and you start to pull back?) Again it all comes down to a straw that you don't know where to put it)


We buy when the price goes down, then on a price reversal we close all buy positions via TP and 1 lock sell Sell Sell.

calculate the closing level of the bed.....everything

 
TEXX:


We raise Buy in a fall; when the price reverses, we close all Buy positions with TP and 1 lock Sell position with TP.

calculate the closing level of the bed.....everything

Unless always replacing 1 old position with 1 new position + lock with TP. It's like a stack with an offset.

Then you can try to start replacing as early as possible, e.g. from the 3rd knee. Then we won't have to open the tray with a large volume.

 

It's not without its bloopers either. In order to close one old buy on a short distance, we need a giant-sized sell.

On a reversal, it will interfere with the closing level of the bundle of bays in b/c will be very far.

 

You need an owl somewhere to make a monkey. Imho.

You have to test without martin, then you can see everything.

That's a year for me, martin and lot increase didn't work. М5.

1...399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413...882
New comment