You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
For those who are interested - it was possible to reach working (average) values of the variable optimal f, by the method of geometric mean according to R. Vince in the EA included in the standard delivery of MA-based MT (see screenshot). Based on the conditions and order of calculation of optimum f by the book, its value is 0.36. After finishing the code, I will post the function here with the description and the order of using it to calculate the volumes of lots opened in future trades according to R. Vince's book.
Congratulations on your success! :))
Thank you. Looks like I'll have to do a TWR array, just to be safe, as you advised.
Congratulations on your success! :))
inflection point f = 0.36, i.e. as f increases further, the TWR variable - decreases - R. Vince is right! :-)))
Um, how can all this be attached to a working EA with the simplest definition of lot size in % of depo? Or maybe I'm not making enough profit)))
I mean, is it all mind games or has a practical application with a positive effect?
Um, how can all this be attached to a working EA with the simplest definition of lot size in % of depo? Maybe I'm not making enough profit)).
I mean all this is a mind game or has a practical application with a positive effect?
Sure, read R Vince - see the posts above in the trailer, I haven't even tested it on a demo myself yet... We'll see... :-)))
I'll post the fiya here as soon as I finish, with a description.
Sure, read R. Vince - see the posts above in the trailer, I haven't even tested it on a demo myself yet... We'll see... :-)))
As soon as I'm done, I'll post the fic here with a description.
Could you tell me what to read from Vince's work? What is the title of the work?
Can you tell me what to read from Vince? What is the title of the work?
Download the trailer from my post on page 2 of the thread from here - pages 30-32.
I think I've figured out where the mistake lies...
Let's go back to the original code, which we've already twisted a few times:
Could it be that the TWR variable is not reset to "1" at each iteration of f?
I think I've figured out where the mistake lies...
Let's go back to the original code, which we've already twisted a few times:
Maybe it's all about the TWR variable not being reset to "1" at each iteration of f?
Yes, a competent point by the way... Possibly...quite possibly. I'll check it this afternoon and post here. Thank you.
Then it's not necessary to create a TWR array (like this one - the fresh version - either...
Here I tried all sorts of exorcisms to proportionally reduce its value in the product (because its absolute value is not important, it's the comparison by more/smaller that matters), so as to prevent overflow when calculating the optimum f.
I was too lazy to paste the code into the EA and check it myself! :)))
I don't have a proper Expert Advisor yet. I have only a few ideas. That's why I took a standard Moving Average without optimizing it and chose a profitable period.
The last code I tried, when I understood that TWR will not reset to "1", was as follows:
No TWR array.
You'll be waiting a long time for an overflow! ;D Although maybe it wouldn't have happened at all...