You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You could of course remove the shelf in the middle, but then it would definitely be a "fit" ))
Can I have a look at your chart from the real world?
In principle you can, if you invest, you will be watching.
It's a good offer))) But not in the dark horse))) You can look at the statistics, can't you...?
Or I'll throw in a thousand.... And there's .... no Paukas, no money)))
Nah, it's not much. The standard fee is 100 quid.
I meant 1000 quid... I'm not good with Russian rubles... and 1000 Belarusian is $0)))
In the middle of the plot is the crisis of late 2008 and six months of 2009
Expectation and profit/loss ratios are not serious, especially for fitting.
The expectation and profit/loss ratios are not serious, especially for fitting.
))) so it's a fit) - ...
)) so it's a fit) - ...
That's what I say "especially for fitting". Would you invest in such a system? I wouldn't.
That's what I'm saying "especially for fitting". Would you invest in such a system? I wouldn't.
Of course not.
) I have a similar statistic... only without the fit.
Expectation and profit/loss ratio are not serious, especially for the fit.
Here's my old owl... ...with no adjustment on one half-index... . on all pairs this would be about this chart....
from 2002 to 2012 with a fixed lot... stoploss - stable 1000p on five digits, no TP - on the market...
Owls are steamed up - only Buy here... Sell with the same kind of success...
Stats are not good at all... especially abs drawdown... although i haven't tried multicurrency risk diversification... - it's only on MT5(...
.. Paukas is probably better...