New trends in technical analysis. - page 17

New comment
 
khorosh:

I don't consider it a glitch. Does one open trade always have to have a balance equal to ecuti? It seems to me they will only be equal when the trade closes or am I defective in my DNA?

And what's more the window header changes.

Compare it with yours.

I.e. the equity curve is not even displayed as it makes no sense.


And you claim I am inattentive. )))

 
khorosh:

I don't consider it a glitch. Should the balance always be equal to ecuti when one trade is open? It seems to me they will only be equal when the trade closes or am I defective in my DNA?

In the illustration given by lasso, the green line sometimes differed significantly from the balance chart over the course of several trades.

It's certainly not a DNA defect, you just got something wrong: the picture is 100% inconsistent with the statement that there has always been no more than 1 deal open.

If the tester displayed equity correctly (if no more than 1 trade is always open), the green lines would always be vertical, because one trade corresponds to one point on the chart.

 
Mathemat:

In the picture above, the green line sometimes significantly differs from the balance graph over several trades.

It's certainly not a DNA defect, you just got something wrong: the picture is 100% inconsistent with the statement that there has always been no more than 1 trade open.

If the tester displayed equity correctly (if not more than 1 trade is always open), the green line would always be vertical, because one trade corresponds to one point on the chart.

I assure you that there is always one trade open. In the tester, if a trade is closed at take profit, then the balance line and equity line have a divergence on the value of profit of this position which closed at take, and these curves converge only at the moment of closing the next trade. Maybe this is different for you, but my tester works this way.

Here is the picture and result:


1 2008.08.18 19:00 buy 1 0.10 1.47313 1.42313 1.48263 0.00 1000.00
2 2008.08.19 21:00 close 1 0.10 1.47670 1.42313 1.48263 35.76 1035.76
3 2008.09.04 07:00 buy 2 0.10 1.45093 1.40093 1.46043 0.00 1035.76
4 2008.09.04 12:00 close 2 0.10 1.45200 1.40093 1.46043 10.70 1046.46
5 2008.09.15 17:00 buy 3 0.10 1.41833 1.36833 1.42783 0.00 1046.46
6 2008.09.15 23:00 t/p 3 0.10 1.42783 1.36833 1.42783 95.00 1141.46
7 2008.09.17 21:00 buy 4 0.10 1.43033 1.38033 1.43983 0.00 1141.46
8 2008.09.17 23:00 close 4 0.10 1.43520 1.38033 1.43983 48.70 1190.16

 
khorosh:

I assure you that there is always one trade open. In the tester, if a trade closes at take profit, then the balance line and the equity line have a divergence on the value of the profit of this position which closed at take, and these curves converge only at the moment of closing the next trade. Maybe it's different for you, but my tester works this way.

Yes, I checked the report with 366 trades - not a single overlap.

But around 265 trades there is a "green bubble" ))

And there indeed, 264 pose closed on t/p, but as the profit is $95 and the maximum scale is $9000 and it is barely noticeable.

So it seems to be true...

Oops.

 
khorosh: In the tester, if a trade is closed at take profit, then the balance line and the equity line have a divergence on the value of the profit of this position, which closed at take, and these curves converge only at the moment of closing the next trade.

It is amazing. It should not be like this. The balance and equity should converge exactly at closing of each trade if there is not more than one position opened. In other words, if there are no open positions, balance=equity. This is not the case here.

This is a reason to contact Technical Support - if this is really the case.

 
Mathemat:

This is a reason to contact technical support.

Is this a reason?



 
That too.
 
Mathemat:

Amazing. This should not be the case. Balance and equity should converge exactly at the close of each trade, if not more than one is always open. In other words, if there are no open positions, balance=equity. This is not the case here.

This is a reason to contact technical support - if this is really the case.

The take is triggered inside the bar, and the tester detects it only at the opening of the next bar (because we work at opening prices), but it doesn't bother me.
 
khorosh:
So you weren't paying attention to the first report. .......

Yes, you're right.

Yuri, I apologise for the suspicion of fabricating reports and for the offensive remarks made about you.

I hope you'll accept my apology.

PS If I may delete some of the posts....

 
khorosh:
Take is triggered inside the bar, and the tester detects it only when the next bar opens (because we work at opening prices), but it doesn't bother me.
Then the open price test is not applicable. Unless you use it on minutes.
1...101112131415161718
New comment