[Archive!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Couldn't go anywhere without you - 2. - page 134
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why the question, man?
Take a number series: 1,2,3,4. What is the arithmetic mean? SA=(1+2+3+4)/4 = 10/4 = 2.5.
Take a numeric row: 1,2,3,4,0,0. What is the arithmetic mean? SA=(1+2+3+4+0+0)/6 = 10/6 = 1.6(6).
Is it difficult to take a fountain pen and paper and check it yourself? Just like a little kid. :)
I'm just wondering why a bar that has never been traded, i.e. whether it needs to be included in a numerical series at all.
as well as the months I didn't trade, in calculating profits
I'm just wondering why a bar that has never been traded, i.e. whether it needs to be included in a numerical series at all.
as well as the months I didn't trade, in calculating profits
and how is this example analogous?
It's just that even though there is no bar, there is one.
Here, if there was no bar, there would be no conversation.
I'm counting the average value and some bars don't have it
zero is the absence of change, not change equal to zero.
I consider the average of existing existing changes, i.e. changes that are
zero is the absence of change, not change equal to zero.
I am counting the average of existing changes, i.e. changes that are there
So are you counting the average of changes on bars or just changes on bars?
Therein lies the big difference.