[Archive!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Couldn't go anywhere without you - 2. - page 134

New comment
 

Why the question, man?

Take a number series: 1,2,3,4. What is the arithmetic mean? SA=(1+2+3+4)/4 = 10/4 = 2.5.

Take a numeric row: 1,2,3,4,0,0. What is the arithmetic mean? SA=(1+2+3+4+0+0)/6 = 10/6 = 1.6(6).

Is it difficult to take a fountain pen and paper and check it yourself? Just like a little kid. :)

 

I'm just wondering why a bar that has never been traded, i.e. whether it needs to be included in a numerical series at all.

as well as the months I didn't trade, in calculating profits

 
eddy:

I'm just wondering why a bar that has never been traded, i.e. whether it needs to be included in a numerical series at all.

as well as the months I didn't trade, in calculating profits

Because when you get in a taxi, you still pay for all seats, no matter how busy they are (going alone or with friends).
 
and how is this example analogous?
 
I think we need to consider the average of the existing changes
 
eddy:
and how is this example analogous?

It's just that even though there is no bar, there is one.

Here, if there was no bar, there would be no conversation.

 
I am counting the average value and on some bars there is none
 
eddy:
I'm counting the average value and some bars don't have it
The main thing here is the presence of a bar. As for values, zero is also a value, just zero.
 

zero is the absence of change, not change equal to zero.

I consider the average of existing existing changes, i.e. changes that are

 
eddy:

zero is the absence of change, not change equal to zero.

I am counting the average of existing changes, i.e. changes that are there

So are you counting the average of changes on bars or just changes on bars?

Therein lies the big difference.

1...127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141...537
New comment