What to do with the grail? - page 15

 
sllawa3:
Off-market quotes - another nonsense from brokerage companies! the same deals (from one expert with the same settings) on different accounts are called different ones! on one of them everything is OK, and on the other - off-market!!!
even if it's OK, what's next?
If you accept the rules of swindlers - don't pips!
 
sllawa3:
where did you see a quote declared as off-market when you lose?!


nEVER seen a non-market quotation yet it is rare (a....ri has ready-made claim forms for non-market quotations).

1) Why shouldn't I believe it will. By the way on pammas with non-market slippages and failures it has recovered losses and more than once.

2)Why do you think reputation is cheaper than a non-market quote.

3) and most importantly force majeure is happening all the time and in everything (even in the railway) but very rarely (and even in the weather) and why do we start with force majeure? You open a terminal and it is full of non-market, right? Or maybe you do not open the trading terminal, and you open the forum and rant there like a grandmother on a bench.

 
sllawa3:
in a..... it gets to the point of nonsense ! an EA opens an opposite order at a stop of the first one ( a pending order stands on a stop ) ... The profit trade is announced at an off-market quote and the moose remains in order!!! or when 14 trades out of 16 are announced as off-market (those in profit) during the night!!! how is it? is it not crazy?
Maybe it was before and now things are getting better. Good luck!
 
Mathemat:

NTH, forget it. That's point #6. Look in the history of the forum.

You want an argument, post testing a constant lot 0.1. Because you probably have lots under a thousand by the end of the trade, right?

EU, M1, 2008.01.01-2009.02.03, lot 0.1. The question is open.

930651 bars in history.
21510439 ticks simulated
Modeling quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 201127.80
Total profit 536124.52
Total loss -334996.72
Profitability 1.60
Expected payoff 0.40
Absolute drawdown 10.00
Maximum drawdown 392.00 (0.36%)
Relative drawdown 1.59% (197.00)
Total trades 507450
Profit trades (% of all) 473955 (93.40%)
Loss trades (% of all) 33495 (6.60%)

Liquidity ceiling)

 

I can test any grail in the tester too !

SymbolEURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period1 Minute (M1) 2010.11.01 00:00 - 2010.11.19 22:59 (2010.11.01 - 2010.11.20)
ModelAll ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
ParametersPips=150; Lot=0.1; SHOW_DEP=0.7;

Bars in history22325Modelled ticks853416Modeling quality25.00%
Chart mismatch errors0




Initial deposit30.00



Net profit192251084.00Total profit192251084.00Total loss0.00
Profitability
Expected payoff284395.09

Absolute drawdown1.10Maximum drawdown219000.00 (1.07%)Relative drawdown32.63% (14.00)

Total trades676Short positions (% win)338 (100.00%)Long positions (% win)338 (100.00%)

Profitable trades (% of all)676 (100.00%)Loss trades (% of all)0 (0.00%)
Largestprofitable trade1655000.00losing transaction0.00
Averageprofitable deal284395.09losing trade0.00
Maximum numbercontinuous wins (profit)676 (192251084.00)Continuous losses (loss)0 (0.00)
MaximumContinuous Profit (number of wins)192251084.00 (676)continuous loss (number of losses)0.00 (0)
Averagecontinuous winnings676Continuous loss0
 

Eh, Slava-Slava... You're playing the same tune all the time: the lots are very big in relation to the depo, and you don't even put any stops. So change your tune.

That's why you can't trust a tester or a DC. You're greedy as hell. Leave some to the DCs themselves, extreme - then they will share with you...

2 NTH: Nah, give it up. You will not get a chance to trade like that in any brokerage company, no matter how good it is. You will not get that in any brokerage company, no matter how marvelous it is. The brokerage system is full of pips, huge amount of deals (half a million during the year, i.e. 2000 a day), and the m.o. of a deal is 0.4 pips.

Oh, I forgot: the modelling quality is 25% and probably most trades are within a minute bar. Well, in short, classic of the genre and point #6.

 
Unfortunately it's only a tester ... In the first case, they are strictly observed throughout the game, while in the second case, they change at the discretion of the very same initially offering these same rules!
 
sllawa3: But in the first case, they are strictly enforced throughout the game, while in the second they are changed at the discretion of the original proposer of these very rules !
Are they strictly enforced in casinos - given the abilities of professional croupiers?
 
Mathemat:
Is it strictly enforced in the casino - given the abilities of professional croupiers?

There are rules and there are pros ... there are two big differences ! and there are pros both from the casino and from the players ! but the rules are the same for all and unchanged ! (at least in casinos)

If a player catches a dealer cheating, the dealer is not a casino employee, and the player is guaranteed to be compensated for his losses! In the eye - it's all God's work!

 
sllawa3:

There are rules and there are pros ... there are two big differences ! and there are pros both from the casino and from the players ! but the rules are the same for all and unchanged ! (at least in casinos)

If a player catches a dealer cheating, the dealer is not a casino employee, and the player is guaranteed to be compensated for his losses! And on the forex - dealers, even .... In the eye - all is the dew !

And what is the reason why your grail does not work on the real market? Because of slippages?