You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The result is this script
Question - Why doesn't it always close all orders? For example, I open three Sell orders one after another and try to close them, but the script may close one or two or all of them. What is the reason?Do you need a script?
Then you don't need a while statement , scripts work in loops as it is.
For the script you need this construction...
I don't remember the link, here is the script which closes all open orders.
The result is this script
Question - Why doesn't it always close all orders? For example, I open three Sell orders in a row, then try to close them with the script, it may close one or two or all of them. What is the reason?And the quotes are how many digits?
Do you need a script?
Do you need a script?
then you don't need the while statement , scripts work in loops as it is.
The script only works once. There is no self-looping there and never has been.
Valenok, do you need the script to close all orders at all, or only this symbol?
Do you need a script?
Then you don't need the while statement , scripts work in loops as it is.
For a script you need this construction...
I don't remember the link, here is a script that closes all open orders.
the script only works once. No self-triggering there and never has been.
Valenok, do you want the script to close all orders at all, or only this symbol?
the script only works once. There is no self-triggering there and never has been.
Valenok, you need the script to close all of the orders, or only this symbol?
Only open orders of one symbol. The pending ones are not affected.
The funny thing is that code criticized in kodobase
works without any problems, but when i started to improve it, i started having problems.
zy:
On the subject of mistaken string
I already figured it out.
Only open orders of one symbol. We do not touch the pending ones.
So, let it go straight to the postponement and let it be. In general form.
You're right, I didn't mean it like that, regardless of the tics...
I'm aware of that.