Does the Grail exist? - page 82

New comment
 
timbo >>:

Даже если максимальные ставки не ограничены казино, выиграть нельзя.


You don't have to speak in patterns! I can do the math without you. You want me to believe you? Why? Just because?
 
peco писал(а) >>

Are you serious? In a sense you are right - it is a good indicator of a professional and honest casino, of which there are few. But 90% just means that the previous, or rather parallel 93%, has gone into deficit! I think you would not argue that anyone has ever seen a losing casino?

_____________


Here's what I wrote about losing at the casino - 95% for example in one day 50 people. - But during the game, there were periods when the player was in the black, that's all. I'm against casinos for gambling. Za for recreation! But it is a contagious thing. On the system is not yet tested (t.z. from 20 -X points. per day) - the main conditions of the absence of TA and FA.
 
peco >>:


Не нужно говорить шаблонами! Я это и без тебя посчитаю. Вы хотите, чтобы я вам поверил? Почему? Просто - потому?

What are you calculating, probability theory? There were once great men who flipped a coin 10,000 times to see if the eagle/ream ratio was really 50/50 or not. I'll just be happy if you don't believe me and get on terver yourself and study all the platitudes I'm talking about here. If you just keep talking nonsense, then... everyone is a blacksmith of their own misery. Anyway, I've done all I can to help you.

 
Ubajal >>:

1. Чтобы заявлять что это ошибка, нужно знать откуда считать, то есть качественная оценка нужна а не количественная, не находишь? Ты же голословно утверждаешь что это ошибка.

OK, here's my quality criterion: would you give Fantasy real money to manage - with just this system, no changes? Like, say, a thousand quid? If you would, for how long?

If you remember, I just raised the issue of inaccuracy in monitoring and we solved it - thanks to great script from Xupypr. I didn't make any assessment - I just stated the fact of over forty percent equity drawdown, not noticeable by monitoring figures.

Where do you see envy here? Envy makes people go blind, as you have so accurately pointed out. I, on the contrary, have an eyesight aggravation :) Eh, I'd better get out of here, let others judge the contest and the results...

 
Mathemat писал(а) >>

OK, here's my quality criterion: would you give Fantasy real money to manage - with just this system, no changes? Like, say, a thousand quid? If you would, for how long?

If you remember, I just raised the issue of inaccuracy in monitoring and we solved it - thanks to great script from Xupypr. I didn't make any assessments, just stated the fact of more than 40% equity drawdown, which was not noticeable in the monitoring figures.

Where do you see envy here? Well, envy makes people go blind, as you have so accurately pointed out. I, on the contrary, have an eyesight aggravation :) Well, I'll be off now, let others judge the contest and the results...


I wouldn't give money either. - Proverbs is a big risk, the author is blinded, TC is intuitive, vanity and intuition are incompatible. I'm going to take a leak myself, and I'm going to practice.
 
Tantrik >>:


Я бы то же денег не дал. - притчины - большой риск, автор ослеплен, ТС - интуиция, тщеславие и интуиция несовместимы. Да я и сам солью заодно и потренируюсь.

Right. Other people's experiences don't teach anyone much, and especially not in the market (stock market, forex, whatever). Or rather, not at all.))

 
Svinozavr писал(а) >>

Right. Other people's experiences don't teach anyone much, and especially not in the market (stock market, forex, whatever). Or rather, not at all)))


+10
 
timbo >>:

Что ты посчитаешь, теорию вероятности? Были в своё время великие мужИ, которые подбрасывали монетку по 10 тысяч раз, чтобы проверить действительно ли будет соотношение орёл/решка 50/50 или нет. Я буду просто счастлив, если ты мне не поверишь, а сам займёшься тервером и изучишь все эти банальности, что я тут говорю. Если ты просто продолжишь говорить глупости, то... каждый сам кузнец своих гемороев. В любом случае я сделал всё что мог, чтобы помочь тебе.

Yes, I do! How can you not believe it when "even great men have flipped a coin 10,000 times" to enlighten themselves on the "bagnosity" of probability theory?!

- "Like who I don't know, but I go to casinos to lose. To lose beautifully, tastefully, with good food and a good show."
- "I don't know about Russia, but in Ukraine casinos are banned. Where do you go?"
- "Is there no other country on the globe besides Russia and Ukraine? "


Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge of probability theory!

 
peco >>:

Спасибо, что поделились вашим опытом и знанием теории вероятности!

I think it's not experience that was shared with you but your understanding of probability theory, I think your experience in understanding probabilistic processes is also lame

peco >>:

No need to talk in patterns! I'll do the math without you. You want me to believe you? Why? Just because?

Why haven't you calculated and read about expectation and variance and quickly wrote an answer? By the way, probability theory does not teach you to lose, and you also need to know how to lose. What you wrote about the casino is true, except that you must know how to lose, but if a person expects that he will always win with Martingale, he is doomed, there is such a science as "financial management" - google it and think about it.
 
Mathemat >>:

ОК, вот мой критерий качества: ты отдал бы Fantasy реальные деньги в управление - именно вот с такой системой, без изменений? Ну, скажем, тыщу баксов? Если отдал бы - на какой срок?

Если помнишь, я просто поставил вопрос о неточности в мониторинге, и мы уже разобрались - благодаря великолепному скрипту от Xupypr'a. Никаких оценок у меня не было - просто констатация факта более чем сорокапроцентной просадки по эквити, не заметной по цифрам мониторинга.

И где ж ты тут зависть углядел? От зависти-то слепнут, как ты точно подметил. А у меня, наоборот, обострение зрения случилось :) Эхх, пойду-ка я отседова, пусть о конкурсе и результатах другие судят...

Mat, I'll answer your question with a working situation, and you can draw your own conclusions, it's better this way: there are people who work according to this scheme, people who find themselves in difficult financial situation apply to them, then the price of the issue is negotiated, obligations are documented, the person who needs help takes a loan, a trade is done, problems are solved, thank you, everyone is free... Fancy is now aiming for something completely different in this game, they got themselves into trouble. They have got themselves into trouble, they say. You should define yourself, do you want to be a trader or earn money, I do not want to be a biorobot.

I drew my conclusions about envy by analyzing the aspects on which you put points of emphasis in your estimations and which you have an aggravated view :)

And as the secretary of the one who got banned )))), I want to translate into literary language, his recommendations, open a demo account on Monday, open a position and avoid the margin call at all costs, even if you beat a drum, even if you jump rope, and while you jump think about why you opened it, when you figure it out - close it. :) Mat, get busy, you're standing in the middle of a question and trying to cross the beginning with the end. A young guy here already wrote that there are a lot of noodles, but they need to be cooked as well, just forget about the forum and cook something, you already know more than you need to.

ZS: Here on the forum in the last week, all sorts of grails dumped in general a bunch, but so far so good...

1...757677787980818283848586878889...213
New comment