You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Judging by the graph ...
The other thought is more redoubtable....
Both thoughts are a consequence of closed black boxes. In this case the indicator from forex-k.
In general it is ridiculous to discuss something based on the unknown.
As an alternative - to wait for the opening of leonid553's indices(if mine do not suit me yet!!!). ;)
Both are a consequence of closed "black boxes". In this case the indicator from forex-k.
In general it is ridiculous to discuss something based on the unknown.
As an alternative - to wait for the opening of leonid553's indices(if mine do not suit me yet!!!). ;)
What is so funny. I am personally familiar with natural spread. I have not seen it in indicator pictures yet. To open or not to open induks - it's personal.
Судя по графику цвета кривулек перепутаны, поэтому вместо покупки сужения спреда произошла его продажа.
Другая мысль более крамольна. А может в результате многочисленных сглаживаний и усреднений натуральный спред идет в противофазе с синтетическим...? А..?
No, the colours are not mixed up.
Apparently wrong (1:1) coefficients - multipliers.
Although the dimensionality of the bonds seems to be equal (108.705 and 123.25) - but the tick size is different.
But if we take coefficients 1:4 we have the right picture:
(though it does not make it clear - why at almost the same dimension should the coefficients be different?)
И та и другая мысль - следствие закрытости "черных ящиков". В данном случае индикатора от forex-k.
Вообще обсужать что-то базирующееся на неизвестном - смешно.
Как вариант - дождаться открытия индюков leonid553(если мои пока!!! не устраивают). ;)
Opened there seg. his turkey, - in 'discussion'
No, the colours are not mixed up.
Apparently, coefficients - multipliers are wrong.
Although bonds dimension seems to be equal (108.705 and 123.25) - but the tick size is different.
But if we take coefficients 1:4 we have the right picture:
(although it does not add clarity - why with almost the same size should be different coefficients?)
Come on, rid, there is a clear blatant error in the direction of the trades. The reasons can only be the ones I mentioned....
Запутался в трех соснах!
Второй день никак не соображу, - в чем дело.
По индикатору от Форекс-к вошел в рынок соответственно графику - 5 февраля, на самом пике гистограммы:
BUY FGBLH0 + SELL FGBSH0 (немецкие бумаги), КОЭФ-ТЫ = 1:1
Никак не могу разобраться, почему - вместо хорошего профита - сижу в обалденном минусе !
Вот текущий результат с демосчета:
Даже если с лотами немного не так рассчитал, - то все равно, не до такой же степени!
The reason may only be the small averaging period, in order to avoid such mishaps you should use a period above 1000 on H1
An unscripted and padded thing. But if it counts, it counts.
I use the results of the counting successfully.
I would still like to get to the bottom of this.
Here is indicator L-553 - the situation is the same on these instruments.
The price lines of February 5 show specific BUY FGBLH0 + SELL FGBSH0 entry - but the middle goes in the wrong direction again and as a result - a heavy loss!
Всё-таки хотелось бы разобраться до конца.
Ценовые линии 5 февр. показывают конкретный вход BUY FGBLH0 + SELL FGBSH0 - а сред опять идет вовсе не туда!
Слишком дорогая бывает цена за такие ошибки.
Here is the correct picture of what is happening with these instruments
I should have sold FGBLH0 ( SELL) and bought FGBSH0 ( BUY )
this is my latest version of the indicator, the green histogram is a profit
entry exactly like Reid, lots 1 and 1
and this is a chart with a refill at the point of drawdown with a second pair of counterparts to accelerate profit growth