You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I.e. the results of the original EA are taken, the filter is built on them.
And then, knowing a priori the distribution of trades, the result is obtained?
How is it different from gathering statistics on the number of copies
in a series of successful and unsuccessful trades?
The frequency filter is calculated for the period from 2006 to 2008, while the Expert Advisor was tested in 2009.
The frequency filter is for the period 2006 to 2008 and the EA was tested in 2009.
Fair enough.
That's why the result is not perfect :-).
Well, I wonder how it works.
The Expert Advisor makes trades - and then you analyse the equity graph spectrally?
Another test: the lot is chosen in proportion to the quantum frequency. For example: frequency=357 so lot=35.7
The lot volumes are not visible, so I will add a screenshot.
And why change the lot? To the eye-there the lot varies by a factor of 4 to 10. Is there a run with a constant lot? :-)
To visualise frequencies, and the first test is just with a constant 0.1 lot.
To visualise frequencies, and the first test is just with a constant lot 0.1.
It's not clear to me what kind of spectrum to build and how to filter it :-) -
But it's ok! Congratulations!
And of course, the name "quantum method" sounds suspicious to me personally.
It is most likely a spectral method in principle, though.
It is not clear to me what kind of spectrum needs to be built and how to filter it :-) -
Building the spectrum and the AFC is only a preparatory step for quantum analysis. Although even these results are already enough to turn any merger into a pseudo-Graal.
===
All details in private.
How do you envisage it?