You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Red - large
Blue-medium
Green-small
and the rest are doji,
want to know the distribution of the candles on the chart?
want to know the distribution of the candles on the chart?
yes, maybe you can modify your indices a bit http://forextools.com.ua/analyse/barstat.html and http://forextools.com.ua/analyse/barstatline.html
Sample size: 5000
instrument: GBPUSD
Period: H1
Average candle size: 229 (on 5 digits)
large candlesticks (>=337): 21.3%
middle candles (337> 229>115): 39.6%
small candlesticks(<115): 37.2%
doji: 1.8%
Now we need to make the second step: look at the frequency distributions of candlestick pairs (and maybe even triples). If the samples show something similar to the histogram of normal distribution - then we can check: at this time after the bar that is drawn at Time[0] we most often get such-and-such, so we have to do such-and-such...
Dug out my swatcher, which I exhibited at ATC'07. For analysis and trading I used only one previous daily bar (GBPUSD), 1-2 trades every day.
I decided to test it without reoptimization till now (i.e. I've left all parameters of September 2007 without changes, except for 5-digit switch).
And of course I removed reinvestment. Frankly speaking, I thought it would fail with the old parameters, the market has changed very much.
The test results are rather modest (The Ministry of Defense and modelling quality leaves much to be desired...) but they do make me think about using candlesticks in real trading.
Sample size: 5000
Symbol: GBPUSD
Period: H1
Average Candle Size: 229 (on 5 digits)
large candlesticks (>=337): 21.3%
middle candles (337> 229>115): 39.6%
small candlesticks(<115): 37.2%
doji: 1.8%
We are also working on a similar idea, we calculate the average difference between the low and the high of the last quarter on M30 and if the difference between the low and the high of the analyzed bar is more than 2 times, ......
But so far the results are worse... If you use a statically entered value, it doesn't matter if it is 35 points or 50 points.
Maybe there is a problem with the period for determining the average bar, maybe a quarter is too long and a couple of weeks is enough??? Or maybe on the contrary, we should take a year? Or maybe there is just another error in the code or algorithm, in short, we need to figure it out... We're just at the beginning of a long journey...
We are also working on a similar idea, we calculate the average difference between Khai and Low for the last quarter on M30 and if for example the difference between Khai and Low of the analyzed bar is more than 2 times, then ......
But so far the results are worse... If you use a statically entered value, it doesn't really matter if it is 35 points or 50 points.
Perhaps, there is a problem with the period of determining the average bar, maybe a quarter is too long and a couple of weeks are enough, or maybe we should take a year, or maybe we just have another error in the code or algorithm, so we must decide... we are just at the beginning of a long journey...
It is not just the body of the candle that needs to be analysed, but also the shadows