You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Очередное подтверждение правильности закона им.Тимбо.
.
You have been on this forum for 3 years.
You've already sold one profitable advisor!!!!
Where's the money, Zin?
I think we should mark that nobody has done anything right, unlike me, I mean tests on the entire history and on all ticks. I have a demo, and even more was on forward-testing.
http://onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=7299
satop, show on a constant lot 0.1. The drawdown is very stressful.
satop, show on a constant lot 0.1. The drawdown is really stressful.
http://acompetition.love-craft.ru/?ptp=6&report=1
ZS: I'm getting a lot of stress from this slump.... friggin.....
Pensioner,
When I try to run this raw material in the tester on GPBUSD M1 it throws the terminal with errors 130 and 131. You can handle 131 from outside, but you can't handle 130.
4350% roughly speaking.....
Stop using martingales.
satop, show me the fixed lot 0.1. The drawdown is very annoying.
This is martingale pure and simple.
>> Well, yeah !
Show something better and with bigger and better results.
Ну да !
Show something better and with a bigger and better result.
I have always thought that the most important thing is stability, and Martin, sooner or later, leads to failure.
Let's say, you can post the state from 2004, I'm sure that it is a total flop there!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes I did, but after I wrote the post.
satop wrote(a) >> Show something better and with bigger and better results.
How long have you been looking at different systems and thinking about them?
How long have you been looking at different systems and thinking about them?
A couple of years.
And I haven't seen anything better for a mechanical system yet, manual doesn't count.
If you have any examples please show me.
A couple of years is a lot, but still not enough for a more or less comprehensive view of the systems.
And how long have you been looking at martingale as the best the human mind could generate as applied to Foreh?
About the examples - hang on, I'll think about it for a while.
A couple of years is a lot, but still not enough for a more or less comprehensive view of the systems.
And how long have you been looking at martingale as the best the human mind could generate when applied to Foreh?
Wait, I will think about it.
My trading robot was used as a martin because there is no need to optimize it and change settings every month. At the moment it is working fine for my measurements in terms of drawdown and profit.
If you show me something better, more profitable and with less drawdown, I will gladly dig in that direction.