Shall we play an interesting game? - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
the results are impressive!
:)
Lot probably 10.0 or even MM included.
The lot must be 10.0 or the MM is included altogether.
Lot constant 0.1
Optimization will be a bit longer, if it doesn't get better, I will run the test and post the state.
I'm sorry, but let's just summarise the rules from all the posts into a pile then, shall we?
....
And then there were additions like only one order.
Well, now it turns out that the profit should be larger than the drawdown!
I do not remember which Soviet film you played in:)"You are a gambler, Paramosha ". That suits us).
All the rules are on the front page, and have not changed since then. And in general, they are just for "seed" ... However, it does not prevent you to experiment with any conditions, just "compete" with no one, because the conditions are not equal.
>> Well, now it turns out that the profit should be greater than the drawdown!
>>It doesn't have to be. It just caught my eye. >>Yes, the number of deals means that there might be more than one order...
"And you're a gambler Paramosha" I can't remember which strictly Soviet movie:) That works for us).
All the rules are on the front page and haven't changed since then. And in general, they are just for "seed" ... However, it does not prevent you to experiment with any conditions, just "compete" with no one, because the conditions are not equal.
>> Well, now it turns out that the profit should be greater than the drawdown!
>>It doesn't have to be. It just caught my eye. The number of deals shows that probably more than one order is used.
I found a mistake!
Not all orders were closed.
Fixed it.
Do you think the result has changed?
JUST THE OPPOSITE!
I'm really using the top-up.
I'll show you the results later!
And then there were additions like only one order.
This was the condition from the beginning:
if (MA2<MA1) { Закрыть короткую, Открыть длинную} if (MA2>MA1) { Закрыть длинную, Открыть короткую}That condition was there from the beginning:
Unobvious!!!
I think the following interpretation makes sense:
if (MA2<MA1) { Закрыть короткую, если есть Открыть длинную в любом случае }If you get a lot of money on every tick, it's no longer a matter of finding a profitable TS, but of winning the MM on the edge of MK.
And that is not interesting.
Somebody post this advisor, please...
I want to play too...with MA parameters
If you get a lot of money on every tick, it's no longer about finding a profitable TS, but about winning the MM on the edge of the MC.
And this is not interesting.
Well, firstly, not every tick, but by opening prices!
I.e. every 4 hours, just when we recalculate the values.
Here's the best result by the way!
I do not understand some of the attacks in this forum!
Can not do it yourself, so everyone else is doing it wrong?
Show us your results!
I think the main problem with visitors to this forum is that they don't want to get fancy, but follow the text letter for letter!
Even when it says NO LIMITATIONS!!!!!