Shall we play an interesting game? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Say, you can use anything other than extra memory to calculate it.
In general, the competition is to see who can write the best optimiser.
Any variable to be optimized is additional memory, but of course the way the additional variables are used determines its size. The problem is from the class of price series compression with respect to operator MA1<MA2 with partial information loss. That is, come up with a compression method with minimal information loss. The compression result is the values of the variables being optimized. You can only compare methods which compress to the same size (number of extra options). imha
If the number of auxiliary variables to be optimised is unlimited, you can, for example, set a PerX variable for each day of the year. The result will be equal to sum of daily optimized equities. You need to limit the number of options, otherwise you'll be able to memorize the entire history.
Well, it's not very sporty; it would be like memorizing deals on the history... We're not on the money, what's the point of cheating?) The point of the game is to try to find the best correlation between periodic indicators and .... like the nature of the price movement or whatever. The task is not new to me, but I have not "stormed" it well, and here the excitement of competition should also spur me on. Join in. Maybe we'll find something interesting together.
Well, that's not sporting, it would be a bit like remembering deals from history... We're not gambling, what's the point of cheating?) The point of the game is to try to find the best correlation between periodic indicators .... like the nature of the price movement or whatever. The task is not new to me, but I have not "stormed" it well, and here the excitement of competition should also spur me on. Join in. Maybe together we will dig out something interesting.
>> got it.)
Wait, are you saying that I can change the period of Mach as many times as I want? Well then it is not interesting at all because it will be one more tester's grail only upside down, with such conditions it is possible to draw a straight line with great success, it turns out a pure fitting...
Try it. You need an algorithm for changing the machining period. My changes are minimal. I haven't checked it quantitatively though. Tried three different ways.
Try it. You need an algorithm for changing the machining period. My changes are minimal. I haven't checked it quantitatively though. I tried three different ways.
any period change algorithm is based on still other variables obtained during optimization or visual analysis(they can then be hidden), then the rules of the game about one variable are violated!
Wait, are you saying that I can change the period of Ma as many times as I want?
...to get a 100% result. ...
any period change algorithm is based on other variables obtained during optimisation or visual analysis (they can then be hidden), then the rules of the single variable game are violated!
To calculate the period of a wiff, it is necessary to apply, for example, a sophisticated neural network. Then it won't be a dummy, but adapted to the market some level that has little in common with the dummy... By the way, it is a cool approach. Maybe even very interesting.