Casino gambler - page 2

 
sayfuji писал(а) >>

Arguments have been made for this. The point is roughly that with certain criteria for opening trades, if the market were random, the ratio of wins to losses for the number of trades --> (lying) 8 would have a 50:50 ratio.

i dont agree.... your profit percentage could be 80% and your average profit/loss ratio is 1/4, so what's the use of this 80% ?

 
timbo писал(а) >>

It is very limited, either up or down - i.e. just two states.

OK, I wish I knew what to call the word "up" and the word "down" and not by looking at history but ahead... experienced people will understand.

 
Figar0 писал(а) >>

I have enough preference with the computer to make sure that you can not beat a dishonest computer.

Yeah, and think if the computer would understand that an unfair game can also earn money, what would it do then :)))) And how do the banks that take bets from us differ from the computer in this case?

 
antoxa_zelyonyj >> :
And then, who told you that after 1.61 the euro can't roll back to 1.01 - that's only one and a half times - under certain force majeure circumstances I think it can.

6,000 points in one tick - is that realistic? >> yeah.

 
antoxa_zelyonyj писал(а) >>

but we can't seem to find the correlation ...

I'm trying the last system and I'm done with it, I'm fed up, I need to have the strength to admit futile efforts :)

The right question is 2/3 of the answer. Think about it, have you looked for this correlation in your research? Searching through indicators and trading systems can go on and on.

There must be a goal and a way to achieve it. The main thing is to formulate the goal correctly (I want money, but it does not work, this is not a goal, but a desire). The researcher must formulate the goal in a different way.

A goal without a way is utopia.

A path without a goal is a road to nowhere.

He who turns from the road, never reaches the goal. So do not give up this business, look for regularities and use them.

 

The criteria for the trade have fixed stop-losses. Profit to winnings was meant in money - 50/50.

Are you only bothered by words? Accidental, not accidental. I am in solidarity with the latest cynical trend on the forum. The fact is that it is possible to make money in the market. That is a fact. And what it's called doesn't matter to me.

 
sayfuji писал(а) >>

The criteria for the trade have fixed stop-losses. Profit to winnings was meant in money - 50/50.

Are you only bothered by words? Accidental, not accidental. I am in solidarity with the latest cynical trend on the forum. The fact is that it is possible to make money in the market. That is a fact. And what it's called doesn't matter to me.

"You can win at roulette - that's a fact". Do you agree?

 
Prival писал(а) >>

the right question is 2/3 of the answer. Think about it, have you looked for this correlation in your research? Searching for indicators and trading systems can go on and on.

There must be a goal and a way to achieve it. The main thing is to formulate the goal correctly (I just want money, it does not work, this is not a goal, but a desire). The researcher must formulate the goal in a different way.

A goal without a way is utopia.

A path without a goal is a road to nowhere.

He who turns from the road, never reaches the goal. So don't give up, look for patterns and use them

it's nice to be encouraged.

but I've been looking for those patterns for five years now... I stopped looking for indicators right after I created a strategy based on crossover moving averages.

And then. I'm not surprised if some of them have degrees in engineering, all smart people. and no one's found one yet... That's saying something too...

You know what kind of a problem comes to mind: "A truck is driving at 60 km/h, how far away will it be in an hour? "

the answer is: "the same distance as it was, because the driver stopped when we started the stopwatch and hovered in the beer hall"...

and no physics or maths works - you either know what's going to happen or you don't. In this problem, the driver knew and nobody knew but him...

 
antoxa_zelyonyj писал(а) >>

... and no one has found one yet...

wrong

 
Prival писал(а) >>

wrong

Have anyone ever seen people who withdraw money from forex without sending them there all the time? I have not. Although many people write that they have. I do not. Although many people write that they have found it.

I don't know if it's true, I don't know if it's true.)