Programmer as a partner - page 6

New comment
 
Fduch писал(а) >>

Yesterday, at 1am this very idea came up and I wrote an EA on it. The only difference: when the stop loss of one order is reached, I open another order in the same direction as the remaining order. After that a TakeProfit is reached (which is at a distance of several points from the stop of the opposite order) and both orders are closed. The result is slightly better -)

Well, your strategy is much more complicated. In the test there are no stops or takeoffs, in the decision-making terms there is not a single parameter, only one order at a time and I wrote it (for the first time) on the second or third day of my acquaintance with MQL, I didn't know any more complicated. But it's not about specific ideas and their implementation, but the fact that they do exist, in spite of the pessimists.

 

Fduch писал(а) >>


Figar0 wrote >>.

Yesterday, at 1am this very idea came up, wrote an expert on it. The only difference: at .

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?

 
mamma писал(а) >>

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?

It's so primitive that you can just pick it up by looking at the balance curve and the TF). I don't want to voice it, not by virtue of being "stiff", but it's just more useful to get to these things yourself.
 
mamma >> :

I don't think Figar0 described his system, or did I miss something?



"It's just a bare, totally symmetrical input-output without a single parameter" (c) Figar0

 
Fduch >> :

"It's just a bare, totally symmetrical input-output without a single parameter" (c) Figar0

Got it, I guess.

Toys from Vinin

 
Figar0 >> :
It's so primitive that you can just pick it up by looking at the balance curve and TF). I don't want to sound it out, not by virtue of "stiffing", but it's just more useful to get to such things yourself.

;)

Strategy Tester Report
Game
AlpariUK-Demo (Build 218)

SymbolEURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
PeriodDaily (D1) 1999.05.24 00:00 - 2008.10.31 00:00 (1999.01.01 - 2008.11.01)
ModelEvery tick (the most precise method based on all available minimum timeframes)
ParametersLots=0.1; MAGIC=0;

Bars in test2562Ticks modelled21122856Modelling quality86.44%
Mismatched charts errors29




Initial deposit1000.00



Total net profit4704.91Gross profit69065.30Gross loss-64360.39
Profit factor1.07Expected payoff1.91

Absolute drawdown16.00Maximal drawdown2985.34 (45.50%)Relative drawdown48.14% (1210.06)

Total trades2463Short positions (won %)1256 (51.27%)Long positions (won %)1207 (53.60%)

Profit trades (% of total)1291 (52.42%)Loss trades (% of total)1172 (47.58%)
Largestprofit trade387.90loss trade-381.92
Averageprofit trade53.50loss trade-54.92
Maximumconsecutive wins (profit in money)12 (601.90)consecutive losses (loss in money)13 (-528.85)
Maximalconsecutive profit (count of wins)709.67 (7)consecutive loss (count of losses)-1043.32 (6)
Averageconsecutive wins2consecutive losses2
 

polished it up:

 

I told you it couldn't get any easier)

 
Figar0 >> :

>> I told you it couldn't get any easier.)

That's the hard truth. How am I supposed to live with that now? :)



Yes, here's the last option (everything stays symmetrical and without sl and tp):


 
mamma >> :

That's the hard truth... How are we supposed to live with that now?! :)



Yeah, here's the last option (everything stays symmetrical and without sl and tp):


How are the trades closed without ss and so on?

1234567
New comment