Tester charts of future championship participants - page 21

 
misterx писал (а) >>

The archive is clipped from the transactions on 2007.01.11 07:23, could you please upload the full report - quite interesting results.

 
misterx писал (а) >>
Strategy Tester Report
Eurjpy_m1_misterx_Championship_2008
MetaQuotes-Demo (Build 218)


Symbol EURJPY (Euro vs Japanese Yen)
Period 1 Minute (M1) 2006.11.23 00:02 - 2008.09.22 19:15 (2006.11.23 - 2008.09.23)
Model All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Parameters _MagicNumber=5077; step0=0.034; step1=0.001; rsibuy=55; rsisell=45; _point=8; StopLoss=94; TakeProfit=5000; _point0=90; _pointSAR=19; slippage=21; _point_stab=41; speed_period=80; speedvolume=120; n1=481; I=16; Ib=16; Ib0=98; barend=1030; _pointbreak=0.01; NameSound="alert.wav"; NameExpert="Eurjpy_m1_misterx_Championship_2008"; _Parameters_b_Lots="---------- LotsWayChoice=1; Lots=1.5; LotsPercent=63; LotsDeltaDepo=500; LotsDepoForOne=500; LotsMax=1000;
Bars in history 630185 Modelled ticks 6322148 Simulation quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 1055276.93 Total profit 3271246.91 Total loss -2215969.98
Profitability 1.48 Expected payoff 578.55
Absolute drawdown 435.44 Maximum drawdown 147476.36 (23.07%) Relative drawdown 50.16% (82721.20)
Total trades 1824 Short positions (% win) 900 (42.78%) Long positions (% win) 924 (47.73%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 826 (45.29%) Loss trades (% of all) 998 (54.71%)
Largest profitable trade 20083.09 losing transaction -4627.75
Average profitable deal 3960.35 losing deal -2220.41
Maximum continuous wins (profit) 24 (82964.72) Continuous losses (loss) 24 (-55902.26)
Maximum Continuous Profit (number of wins) 84854.09 (15) Continuous loss (number of losses) -78489.84 (21)
Average continuous winnings 5 continuous loss 6

How can this be. The testing interval for the test starts from 1.01.2008 and you have it from 11.23.2006, i.e. two years.

This is all bullshit. Present the graph and report of the automatic checking system.

 
misterx писал (а) >>

In fact, it's an interesting result. Of course, there are a lot of questions about why and why, but I think the championship will answer them comprehensively. So, I won't ask now - we'll see ))))

 
LeoV писал (а) >>

In fact, it's an interesting result. Of course, there are a lot of questions about why and why, but I think the championship will answer them comprehensively. So I won't ask now - we'll see ))))

And I don't believe any of this. If I put up my chart then it's an exact copy of the automatic checking system report.

And if they start displaying charts and reports as I want and from where I want, then I will once again say that all this is bullshit.

There is no interesting result.

 
Serg_ASV писал (а) >>

Good point, I agree ))))

>> what's the good sense in it?

 
I agree with the previous speaker. The topic is about the systems of the participants in the championship and was created to compare the results of the tester and the actual results. And million-dollar pictures can be measured somewhere else. It is better suited to the situation.
 

ADVERTISEMENT!

I agree with the above - there are a lot of million-states (I can show you my demo report for 2 500 000 000 for 1.5 days).

Traders-programmers are not trying to show off their skills in this post, they are displaying the results of testing of Expert Advisors before the Championship.

Sincerely, Serg_ASV.

 
sandex писал (а) >>

What's sensible about it?

The point is that real EAs giving 10-15% profit per month are not exhibited for the Championship. They only have extremely complicated test variants with the target of at least 30 000 profit within the Championship period. That is why it is profitable, i.e. not to lose money.

 

Better said at the last championship that the test results are mostly based on how one fits the data in the tester, so most of them will probably not match the test results. Of course, it is nice for the developer to be in an illusion for a while and see the potential, but turning it into reality is obviously a big art. Actually that second graph I showed without any jokes before the removal were indeed the real results of the competition test. I had this EA on my test for a year with no restrictions out of 10000 made several billion $. It is naturally over-optimized to the limit and mm over-aggressive. I optimized it until 20.08.2008. So from that day until today he would have already drained everything. So you can feel like a billionaire "in the sky", in the project, on the tester, but it's very difficult to sink even a small percentage of it down to Earth...

 
Strategy Tester Report
tran_ms
MetaQuotes-Demo (Build 218)

Symbol GBPJPY (Great Britain Pound vs Japanese Yen)
Period 4 Hours (H4) 2008.01.02 08:00 - 2008.08.19 20:00 (2008.01.01 - 2008.08.20)
Model Every tick (the most precise method based on all available minimum timeframes)
Parameters TakeProfit=530; StopLoss=170; _Param_Trailing_=" --- ��������� ��������-����� ---"; UseTrailing=1; MinProfit=350; TrailingStop=100; TrailingStep=140; UnLossLewel=56; N=19; Lots=0; PercentFreeMargin=30; MAGIC=12345; MA_Short_Period=4; Info=true; Unloss=true; Distance=12; Sense=8; Period_X=240;
Bars in test 1990 Ticks modelled 4289983 Modelling quality 90.00%
Mismatched charts errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Total net profit 304376.32 Gross profit 378401.66 Gross loss -74025.34
Profit factor 5.11 Expected payoff 3074.51
Absolute drawdown 702.93 Maximal drawdown 34552.60 (13.83%) Relative drawdown 50.76% (12112.54)
Total trades 99 Short positions (won %) 82 (74.39%) Long positions (won %) 17 (76.47%)
Profit trades (% of total) 74 (74.75%) Loss trades (% of total) 25 (25.25%)
Largest profit trade 24626.08 loss trade -6829.63
Average profit trade 5113.54 loss trade -2961.01
Maximum consecutive wins (profit in money) 24 (164915.45) consecutive losses (loss in money) 7 (-18519.27)
Maximal consecutive profit (count of wins) 164915.45 (24) consecutive loss (count of losses) -18519.27 (7)
Average consecutive wins 6 consecutive losses

2

But this is the message I received yesterday and my response:

Renat:
Unfortunately, your expert is not admitted because of infringement of a rules 2.5 & 2.6

Весьма странное утверждение, вот в чём уверен на 100%, так это в отсутствии множественных регистраций, даже по случайным причинам. Так как никогда ни для кого кода не писал, весь код написан мною лично, программу Трафик компрессора специально отключил, наученный горьким опытом Чемпионата 2006, работал только со своего компьютера. Поясните пожалуйста, откуда появились такие выводы и в чём именно заключается нарушение ?
Let's wait for an explanation.