Tester charts of future championship participants - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The archive is clipped from the transactions on 2007.01.11 07:23, could you please upload the full report - quite interesting results.
How can this be. The testing interval for the test starts from 1.01.2008 and you have it from 11.23.2006, i.e. two years.
This is all bullshit. Present the graph and report of the automatic checking system.
In fact, it's an interesting result. Of course, there are a lot of questions about why and why, but I think the championship will answer them comprehensively. So, I won't ask now - we'll see ))))
In fact, it's an interesting result. Of course, there are a lot of questions about why and why, but I think the championship will answer them comprehensively. So I won't ask now - we'll see ))))
And I don't believe any of this. If I put up my chart then it's an exact copy of the automatic checking system report.
And if they start displaying charts and reports as I want and from where I want, then I will once again say that all this is bullshit.
There is no interesting result.
Good point, I agree ))))
>> what's the good sense in it?
ADVERTISEMENT!
I agree with the above - there are a lot of million-states (I can show you my demo report for 2 500 000 000 for 1.5 days).
Traders-programmers are not trying to show off their skills in this post, they are displaying the results of testing of Expert Advisors before the Championship.
Sincerely, Serg_ASV.
What's sensible about it?
The point is that real EAs giving 10-15% profit per month are not exhibited for the Championship. They only have extremely complicated test variants with the target of at least 30 000 profit within the Championship period. That is why it is profitable, i.e. not to lose money.
Better said at the last championship that the test results are mostly based on how one fits the data in the tester, so most of them will probably not match the test results. Of course, it is nice for the developer to be in an illusion for a while and see the potential, but turning it into reality is obviously a big art. Actually that second graph I showed without any jokes before the removal were indeed the real results of the competition test. I had this EA on my test for a year with no restrictions out of 10000 made several billion $. It is naturally over-optimized to the limit and mm over-aggressive. I optimized it until 20.08.2008. So from that day until today he would have already drained everything. So you can feel like a billionaire "in the sky", in the project, on the tester, but it's very difficult to sink even a small percentage of it down to Earth...
2
But this is the message I received yesterday and my response:
Unfortunately, your expert is not admitted because of infringement of a rules 2.5 & 2.6