Is it possible to make bespoke EAs for the championships? - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
We conduct the Championship among traders who understand trading on financial markets and are able to create a trading Expert Advisor on their own. Consequently, each Participant must have knowledge of the subject and be able to answer any question on automated trading. Any suspicion of spoofing a Participant can lead to disqualification. If you fear that you have broken a particular Rule, this is cause for you to think seriously.
That's right. I agree, the laws need to be enforced. I think it's more about the prizefighters.
But the restriction is not entirely clear. I'm sure it will be removed as soon as the popularity of the championship begins to fall. The market segment (the number of customers) is narrowing.
I agree with Mathemat that the purpose of making the EA public may be battlefield testing, or advertising, or ...... and other far-reaching goals.
It is. I agree, the laws need to be enforced. I think this is more of a concern for prize winners.
But the restriction is not entirely clear. I'm sure it will be removed as soon as the popularity of the championship starts to drop. The market segment (the number of clients) is narrowing.
I agree with Mathemat that the purpose of making the EA public may be to test it in combat conditions, or advertising, or ...... and other far-reaching goals.
Currently registered: 1619. Submitted experts: 204. Until the end of registration: 23 days
there are not many days left - I believe the majority will come around September 15
confused by the small number of applicants - last year there were 2000, but apparently there were a lot of SHOOLERS!
The number of registrations last year was 2,000 thousands of which 600 people were accepted.
This year it will not be possible for pipsipsers!
If we come up with around 2000 registrations and 600 skipped registrations, we will probably take the tournament to the UP level in terms of numbers
then either narrow the rules - or allow variations - for popularity - or look for other ways to raise the rating and the number
but if we assume that suddenly the number of cheats became less, 1620 is a good figure, provided that there will be more than 600
---
but still - it's not great that the rules are cutting off stagers! who could have just booked an expert...
AreOZ0 and Geronimo not twins?
One's email is the same as the other's...
AreOZ0 and Geronimo not twins?
One's email is the same as the other's...
How did you guess?
Phenomenal analytical thinking!!!
Congratulations...
Need any more tips?
YuraZ 27.08.2008 19:19
...but still - it's not great that the rules cut off stagers! who could have just ordered an expert...
>> Quite right.
*****************
It would be interesting to divide the championship into categories like: Neural Networks, Using Fixed Lots, Pipsers, ... or even come up with difficulty categories ... good thoughts on the subject all read.
but still - it's not great that the rules cut off stagers! who could have just commissioned an expert...
Apparently, in that case, the expert should be represented by a team of stager and developer (and possibly a tester/optimiser). Why not?
It doesn't take forever for a lone enthusiast to work. Serious things are written by teams.
Apparently, in that case, the expert should be represented by a team of stager and developer (and possibly a tester/optimiser). Why not?
Logically...
Apparently, in that case the expert should be represented by a team of stager and developer (and possibly a tester/optimizer). Why not?
the team option, so to speak, is not yet recognised...
unfortunately - or fortunately - the rules do not allow it...
there will be a difficulty with the official distribution of prizes
that is, the "sport" at the moment is individual
---
again - let's say a team has created an expert - and he's a competitor in 2008
but then you'd have to - put up an "official" to represent the team!
---
Officially - at once - unequal conditions arise!
1 - for imagine a chess player who prepares himself completely
2 - and imagine a chess player with young masseuses running around,
there is a powerful computer centre of 1000 people, calculating variants of endgame openings
there is a group of 100 people who study the opponent's games
etc.
---
To level the playing field, we could divide the contest into sub-categories - "collective developments" and "individual developments".
From an investor's point of view, however, collective developments will have a greater margin of safety and a greater guarantee of profit.
P.S. By the way, masseuses are an idea...
I propose that the winners of the Championship be given masseuses as a bonus...
the team option, so to speak, is not yet recognised...
...again - let's say a team and created an expert - and he is a competitor 2008
but then we'd have to - expose the "official" representing the team!
---
Officially - at all at once - unequal conditions arise!
1 - for imagine a chess player who prepares himself completely
2 - and imagine a chess player with young masseuses running around,
there is a powerful computer centre of 1000 people, calculating variants of endgame openings
there is a group of 100 people who study the opponent's games
etc.
---
*****************
It would be interesting to divide championship into categories like: Neural Networks, Using fixed lots, Pips players, ... or even come up with difficulty categories ... good thoughts on the subject everyone has read.
Let's add a category - Team Championship. This is how wars will be fought in the future - without blood and without borders.
In order to level the playing field, the competition can be divided into subcategories - 'collective developments' and 'individual developments'.
From an investor's point of view, collective developments would have a greater margin of safety and a greater guarantee of profit.
why? oops, sorry, that came out ;-)
there can only be one guarantee - the probability of errors in the code is lower, its professionalism is higher. but the guarantee of profit is not...