Transaction volume - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
timbo писал (а):Korey писал (а):
You didn't answer the question "What is the rule of which exchange to trade lots?"
You're getting into an argument that has an ancient answer with a beard...
1) Indicators that calculate the volume work correctly exactly on the volume of transactions
that the trading system of the exchange for the instrument...
If there is no volume source, for example for currencies and other instruments
The tick volume is used, which allows this kind of work.
to these indicators and even do some analysis on the value of tick volumes...
Well, I'm just showing,
.
timbo wrote (a):Korey wrote (a):
You didn't answer the question "Which stock exchange's rule for lot trading?"
You're making an argument which has an ancient answer with a beard...
Indicators that calculate the volume work correctly exactly on that volume of trades
that the trading system of the exchange for the instrument...
2) And when there is no volume source, for example for currencies and other instruments
the tick volume is used, which to some extent allows to work
to these indicators and even do some analysis on the value of tick.volumes...
absolutely right!
WOW! that's a different volume - you don't get that in forex!
and we are dealing with a TICK volume
The only thing you should think about is: ONE TICK = +1 to VOLUME and nothing else.
Korey - tried to say that for one TICK he got increase to VOLUME more than +1, but there is no proof
Well, I'm just showing,
.
You've been told by the developers! VOLUME is the THICK volume.
:-)))
ONE TICK +1 to VOLUME and nothing else, no matter whether the tick is up or down, one unit is added to VOLUME for one tick
You use the word " nonsense" a lot.
It's the only possible censorable evaluation of what you say.
You didn't answer the question, "What stock exchange rule is lot trading?"
Gee, you're trying to prove your own worth, that you're so rich and smart that you trade CFDs )))) It's hereditary again.)
There you go again, farting in the puddle instead of answering.
Why would it be more expensive to trade CFDs than forex? And equities are even more expensive? The question remains - take responsibility for your words.
Well yes, Tick volume is for ticking.
To clarify: what else do we call a tick?
A tick is a change in a quote coming into the trading terminal.
Then, and therefore, the tick volume in its most direct meaning is the volume at the moment of the quotation change.
But in MT-4 the charts are represented by periods, not by ticks, that is why there is a confusion of names and contents.
For Englishmen a "tick" is anything. So they have no contradiction in calling the volume per period a tick volume.
You use the word " nonsense" a lot.
It's the only possible censorable evaluation of what you say.
You didn't answer the question, "What stock exchange rule is lot trading?"
Gee, you're trying to prove your own worth, that you're so rich and smart that you trade CFDs )))) It's hereditary again.)
You're farting in the puddle again instead of answering.
Why would it be more expensive to trade CFDs than forex? And the stock is even more expensive? The question remains - take responsibility for your words.
You have to pass your final exams and you are already off-topic.
Well yes, Tick volume is for ticking.
To clarify: What else do we call a tick?
A tick is a change in a quote coming into the trading terminal.
Then, and therefore, the tick volume in its most direct meaning is the volume at the moment of the quotation change.
But in MT-4 the charts are represented by periods, not by ticks, that is why there is a confusion of names and contents.
For Englishmen a "tick" is anything. So they have no contradiction in calling the volume per period a tick volume.
I understand what the volume is and what the tick is
per TICK VOLUME is increased by +1
then this VOLUME shows what? NOTHING! just the amount of ticks received in a period of time
and the sum of ticks up and ticks down
ON FOREX VOLUME does NOT show how many MILLIONS or LOTS were thrown on the exchange at that point in time!!!
this is exactly what it's about
---
no wonder there are a lot of ticks going both ways in a period of strong moves
but again, this is ONLY the number of ticks - tick volume
but not the amount of MONEY or LOTS
---
if you can tell by the number of ticks how many reversals and levels --- that's fine.
but you don't see how much is sold and how much is bought
Good day to all!
I don't understand MQL4 very well yet, so there are some (probably rather silly) questions
1) How to determine the number of trades for such and such a period.
2) Is there any way to determine the actual amounts spent by bears or bulls? (I've heard that you can only get the number of deals, but not their amounts).
I have a very interesting idea how to use it. So please advise.
If there is no way to get accurate data, then at least approximate data based on some indicators.
and this is what the author asked!!!
the answer is
1) no it is not possible
2) no can
1. those volumes that the "standard" DC and its MT-4 give show everything that is required from the volumes.
I.e. everything that depends on volumes I personally tried TC and have no complaints, it works as it should. (Volumes It's not body weight/mass.))
2. open interest Bid/ask separately and by minutes is found in adult terminals,
like Metastock + advanced DC.
Here's your statement.
my answer:
1 VOLUME does not show it
2 VOLUME does not show what you think it shows
VOLUME shows the number of ticks just the body weight!
---
at brokers under MT4