You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The real guys are much more interested in stability (they are the real conservatives), not in odd and random profits without drawdowns. 43.55% drawdown is not serious.
Alexander, still a long way to the sales, you need to go through all the tests, demo, real and so on, in general, in about a month I'll start selling, a little over $ 300 will be I think.
How do you sell this? 35 Deals, is no indicator at all. When optimising 35 deals, it is a pure fit. If it has been tested after the optimization since the beginning of this year, it is sufficient to run the Expert Advisor again, but since November 1, 2007, and the illusions will be dispelled immediately.
delyus, do that and post the balance graph?
Or maybe I am wrong? Perhaps, you have optimized your Expert Advisor on a history from 2000 to 2007 and then ran the test out of the optimization period for 2008 and published this test in the first post of this thread? Then, - "sabsem drugoi business, sluzhay, eh?"
I think the winner of the 2008 championship is already known, the intrigue has already disappeared today))) And then a white steamboat, azure shore, under each armpit on the chick and stuff like that))).
=) If I were you, I wouldn't wait for the 2008 Champ if everything is so positive =) and the price is "about 300 quid" =)
That's my big break, that's my big break. The strategy is unique...
I'm more than sure that after a detailed review of the EA there will be no trace of uniqueness.
ps: it's strange, all the skeptics "swallowed" the report without even asking for a test of a constant lot ;)
That's my big break, that's my big break. The strategy is unique...
I'm more than sure that after a detailed review of the Expert Advisor uniqueness will be gone.
ps: it's strange, all the skeptics "swallowed" the report without even asking for a test of a constant lot ;)
here's an approximate test with constant lot =) profit is approx 345pp t=)
Andrei, I'm sick of being reminded of that, actually. The shortcomings are already apparent.
I can already, without even reading the text, say "oh, here we go again". It's like soap operas on TV: you click on another channel and a second is enough to understand that it's a soap opera.
I've already eaten a lot of salt with you guys, you're insulting me! The Expert Advisor has been profitable since the beginning of time, even if you run it on any currency, any brokerage company, even on 5 spreads. There is no optimization, no adjustment, the firm has not tied any wires: strictly TP15, SL18 and going forward for 8 years. And you probably understand what happens when you decrease TP? For example by 2 times, the profitability rises above 10. And with TP3 the profit factor can hardly be calculated - for 2 years not a single loss! Can you imagine? That's what I did. The strategy is unique, at least I haven't seen it myself. I think the winner of the 2008 championship is already known, the intrigue has already disappeared today)) He is now on a white steamboat, the Cote d'Azur, with a heifer under each arm and so on).