What does a freelancing client pay for for an EA in exp format or for open source code? - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't give in to provocation. There is a difference -- a) discussing the best way to proceed and how it should be right -- and b) discussing the nuances of the agreement.
If I were a moderator -- if you were a programmer now -- I'd ban you and delete this thread.
There is Freelance and there are Freelance rules and facilities to discuss agreements.
And why should I be banned? I just want to get what I paid for ... I paid for a full-fledged EA ... A exp is not a full-fledged EA ... I also ask how in the future I can prove that this is my EA, if I do not even have an open source code?
How do I know why he did that? Maybe it's his rules.
The fact is -- he didn't do anything wrong -- you screwed up.
How do I know why he did that? Maybe it's his rules.
The fact is -- he didn't do anything wrong -- you screwed up.
What am I doing wrong if I give his name? I think I'd be doing the right thing if I gave his name, protecting my interests. I wonder who would get screwed if they lost new orders. I think it's just stupid.
What would I be doing wrong if I said his name? I'd be doing the right thing if I gave it out, protecting my interests. Who'd be the loser, losing new orders? I think it's stupid...
have you read the rules of freelancing https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules?
п 5.4. "Discussion of the arbitration situation and adjudication shall take place directly in the relevant Application. "
Who you work with is common knowledge -- it's public information available from your profile -- and Fedoseev knows it well, so why would he bother with this question, just to chat.
have you read the rules of freelancing https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules?
п 5.4. "Discussion of the arbitration situation and adjudication shall take place directly in the relevant Application. "
Who you work with is publicly known -- it's public information available from your profile -- and Fedoseev knows this very well, so why did he bring it up, just to chat.
Are you still on the same page?
In arbitration, the discussion is in the discussion of the work.
This is not arbitrage or freelancing, this is just a forum thread.
Have you got the sky and the earth mixed up yet?
In arbitration, the discussion is in the discussion of the job.
This isn't arbitration, it's just a forum thread.
have you read the rules of freelancing https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules?
п 5.4. "Discussion of the arbitration situation and adjudication shall take place directly in the relevant Application. "
Who you work with is common knowledge -- it's public information available from your profile -- and Fedoseev knows this very well, so why did he bring it up, just to chat.
I am the customer and the programmer is just the programmer, how can he take over what he has ordered?