The three-screen system is 100% performance to the upside. - page 5

 
Ivan Vagin:


So why do a job whose outcome is obvious? -slip. Any bet in a casino has a negative MO. That is, you always get less at the risk of more. And no combination of bets, each of which has negative MO, can give positive MO, it's obvious. Martingale-like strategies are no exception.

Playing martingale with an infinitely large deposit ? This is utopia. The result of playing martingale will be the loss of an infinitely large deposit)

 

That's funny.

"The end result of infinite martin playing with an infinite deposit will be to drain an infinite deposit".

Crazy philosophy beyond the categories of mathematics )

 
Ром:

So why do a job whose outcome is obvious? -slip. Any bet in a casino has a negative MO. That is, you always get less at the risk of more. And no combination of bets, each of which has negative MO, can give positive MO, it's obvious. Martingale-like strategies are no exception.

Playing martingale with an infinitely large deposit ? This is utopia.

This is not a casino we are discussing here, but a three screen system.

Maybe someone will briefly describe in his own words, its advantages or disadvantages, or at least its itself.

 
Ром:

That's funny.

"The end result of infinite martin playing with an infinite deposit will be to drain an infinite deposit".

Crazy philosophy beyond the categories of mathematics )

Or a default of some economy!
 
Alexey Busygin:
Or a default, of some economy!
Nah, all the money in the world's economies is finite. It's not enough for us - pennies - we've grown to infinities.)
 
Ром:
Nah, all the money in the world's economies is finite. It's not enough for us - a pittance - we've grown to infinities).
Or degradation, too, can be infinite.
 
Ivan Vagin:

I just have a condition that someone should code at least in the first approximation, so that the code would be open here, so that there would be fewer questions and errors could be analyzed collectively.

to run the machine algorithm

to post the results of the algorithm here.

The algorithm is very simple - I think an average programmer can work with it for an evening or even less.

if you sign up to at least a first approximation to write the code I'll write here in detail what and how

write the algorithm - I'll do the code

p.s. you can make a separate thread so as not to interfere with the three screens

 
Sergey Chalyshev:

Write the algorithm - I'll do the code.

p.s. you can make a separate branch so as not to interfere with the three screens

created Absolute Confrontation, please moderate some of the posts there
 

Three screens on M1 M15 and H1 from left to right - it's more comfortable for me.

Bollinger i-Regr_alert Dserg-LinR

Stochastic with settings changed from default.

The simpler the system, the more stable it is.

 
Petr Baskakov:

Three screens on M1 M15 and H1 from left to right - it's more comfortable for me.

Bollinger i-Regr_alert Dserg-LinR

Stochastic with settings changed from default.

The simpler the system, the more stable it is.

And why the first screen M1, and not M3? Isn't there a fivefold difference between the screens?