The three-screen system is 100% performance to the upside. - page 4

New comment
 
Ivan Vagin:
do the neighbours want one?
No! They're guessing from the cockroaches.
 
Alexey Busygin:
No! They're guessing at cockroaches.
In general, there is an observation - testing results are very different only for short term strategies. If we use strategies based on М30, H1 or higher, all errors related to processing of brokerage orders become negligible compared to opening/profit/stop parameters specified by us (our robots). Of course, if the brokerage company has a conscience.
 
Vadim Zotov:
In general, there is an observation - testing results are very different only for short term strategies. All errors in processing of brokerage orders at strategies based on М30, H1 and higher are negligible when compared to the opening/profit/stop parameters specified by us (our trading robots). Of course, if our brokerage company has a conscience.
But of course we cannot do it with conscience - we should look for honest guys like London Deceased, but still of course with a good conscience...))
 
Ivan Vagin:
I'm not a programmer, it's not a grail, it's just a general direction... you have three years to work on the ts package and you can retire

I still do not trust testers, their calculations differ too much from demo, cent and real.

My experience shows that it is impossible to make a profitable strategy out of a losing one. I have collected dozens of TS and applied various methods to their equity charts to make a decision to trade/not to trade. But. If I failed, it does not mean that you or anyone else will fail.

/****

Imho, it is better to create a normal TS, diversify by instrument - and retire a month after the launch, if you do not like your main job).

 
Сергей Криушин:
You can't sew conscience on the case - you have to look for honest ones like the London detscheeks, but still, of course, with a big conscience...)
What kind? London honest ones? Everywhere, double standards.
 
Ром:

My experience tells me that it is impossible to make one profitable strategy out of a package of losing strategies. I have collected dozens of TSs and applied various methods to their equity charts to make a decision to trade or not to trade, and nothing good came out of them. But. If I failed, it does not mean that you or anyone else will fail.

/****

Imho, it is better to create a normal TS, diversify by instrument - and retire a month after the launch, if you do not like your main job).

It's not everyone who's talking about a package of loss-making tools. we started with the idea that almost any profitable tool has periods of profitability and loss and you can use them.

again, such a package is not all there is to it.
 
Ivan Vagin:
As for the profitability of roulette, it has periods of profitability and loss, but you can't take advantage of that.

again, this is not the whole package
Roulette profitability chart also has periods of ups and downs, very similar to the trends on instrument charts and to the equity of many systems, but it cannot be used profitably.
 
Ром:
Roulette also has periods of rise and fall, very similar to the trends on the charts of instruments and equity in many systems, but it is impossible to use profitably.
I think roulette is simple enough, I can post the algorithm here, I'm still in the hospital for a week, I can give you a lot of tips.
without casino restrictions the system will show profits tending towards infinity

It would not work in a real casino because the casino rules themselves limit the workability of the scheme in real life

But as an example of the possibility of using one system against another would be telling
 
Ivan Vagin:
I think with roulette simple enough, I can lay out the algorithm here, I'm still a week in the hospital, I can tell you a lot.
without casino restrictions the system will show profits tending towards infinity

It would not work in a real casino because the casino rules themselves limit the workability of the scheme in real life

but as an example of how one system can be used against another, it would be telling.

It would be very interesting to know.

 
Ром:

It would be very interesting to know.

But I have a condition that someone should code at least a first approximation, so that the code would be open here, so that there would be fewer questions and errors could be analyzed collectively.

to run the machine algorithm

to post the results of the algorithm here.

The algorithm is very simple - I think an average programmer can work with it for an evening or even less.

If you sign up to at least a first approximation, I'll write the code here in details.

1234567
New comment