Gorgeous Uncle Martin Gale - The Thorny Road to Millions or Total Collapse ! - page 2

New comment
 
Evgeny Belyaev:
If you calculate profit in pips instead of money, then you will understand why the risks are overestimated.
If you count in pips, you probably know, so tell me without any riddles.
 
The topic of martin has been discussed a million times. Yes, martin is not going to die out like a mammoth - it will live forever)
 
Evgeny Belyaev:
You should count your profits in points, not in money, then you will understand why the risks are exaggerated.
Profit is something that can be spent. Where in the world do they accept payment in pips?
 
khorosh:
If the initial deposit is doubled every month using martin, and the loss over the year is, for example, two initial deposits, then it is almost a grail. Now try to refute that it cannot be.

But the point is that if you "double every month", the losses will not be an unfortunate "two initial deposits".

 
Evgeny Belyaev:
Martin can drain even before doubling the deposit. If you have a profitable, stable strategy, why do you need martin? Martingale can kill even a profitable strategy because the risks are constantly inflated.
You got the question and the answer wrong... The question is the answer. Martin should be applied to a "From the Lantern" strategy.
 
khorosh:
Of course, it's much easier for a programmer to find a profitable strategy.

the progs write hundreds of owls for clients. they must have kept copies of their profitable systems.

hence the question - why aren't they millionaires?

they hang around here 24 hours a day, doing jobs for 10 quid...

They show profit on tests or on demos.

 
valeriy odintsov:

the progs write hundreds of owls for clients. they must have kept copies of their profitable systems.

hence the question - why aren't they millionaires?

they hang around here 24 hours a day, doing jobs for 10 quid...

and show their profits on tests or on demos.

Just about every post you wrote shows your dislike of programmers, paranoia? Or is it something more serious? :)
 
valeriy odintsov:


...they're here all day, doing jobs for 10 quid...

What are you doing here?
 
valeriy odintsov:

the progs write hundreds of owls for clients. they must have kept copies of their profitable systems.

hence the question - why aren't they millionaires?

they hang around here 24 hours a day, doing jobs for 10 quid...

and show their profits on tests or on demos.

It is precisely because "10$ tasks" - similar tasks are, as a rule, completely one and the same, and therefore the result of their work is the same - at best the lack of profits. At worst, they fail.
 
George Merts:
It is precisely because "jobs for 10 quid" - such tasks are, as a rule, completely one and the same, and therefore the result is the same - at best, no profits. At worst, they are dumped.
Indeed, programmers are busy coding primitive nubs' strategies, but they have no time to develop and code their own strategies. Moreover, even for a programmer to find a profitable strategy is not an easy task and requires much time.
123456789...13
New comment