The task of searching for orders - page 9

 
Михаил:

Dimitri!

They should, but it is not clear, do you restart the Expert Advisor every 5 minutes?

Yes, even once every three years, in any case, the expert should allow it.

 
Михаил:

It's "money for fish" again!

What has made the program "unreliable" if orders are killed (when the EA is restarted) that have no control over?

Somebody answer the question:

Why do I need to restore control, if I do not restart the EA every 5 minutes?

P/S And what would you say about reliability if I (sometimes) don't go near the computer for a week while trading (I don't even think about it),

and go fishing, for example?

Because we don't live in the Middle Ages. If something is lazy or difficult for you to do, it does not mean that it is wrong.

Your approach is reminiscent of:

ps. With that approach, it really is better to go fishing more often than to go near a computer.

 
More unsubstantiated answers!
 
Михаил:
Again with the unsubstantiated answers!
Why prove the obvious?
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
Why prove the obvious?

But you've taken it upon yourself to refute my assertions.

Obvious to you, but to me (and maybe to others) not at all.

Why, would a working expert be overloaded at all?

It happens ONLY in an emergency situation, and I, for example, in

3.5 years, such a situation just never happened!

Internet connection never crashed, windows never crashed, terminal never hung up.

Because I WILL make sure it doesn't happen!

P/S If anyone's wondering how?

You can read about it in my blogs.

 
Михаил:

But you've taken it upon yourself to refute my assertions.

Obvious to you, but to me (and maybe to others) not at all.

No, I haven't. At first you have made an impression that you are sincerely interested in it, so I tried to explain, gave a vivid example. It turned out that you have other aims and goals, and I just had some free time. Actually, I do not care whether you agree or not, whether you understand or not. I can only advise you to go fishing more often.
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
No, I did not get hooked on such things. At first, you gave the impression that you were genuinely interested, so I tried to explain and gave an illustrative example. It turned out that you had other goals and objectives, and I just had some free time. Actually, I do not care whether you agree or not, whether you understand or not. I can only advise you to go fishing more often.
I'd love to go fishing, but I wish you wouldn't get into trouble by overloading the experts (no offence).
 
Михаил:

But you've taken it upon yourself to refute my assertions.

Obvious to you, but to me (and maybe to others) not at all.

Why, would a working expert be overloaded at all?

It happens ONLY in an emergency situation, and I, for example, in

3.5 years, such a situation just never happened!

Internet connection never crashed, windows never crashed, terminal never hung up.

Because I WILL make sure it doesn't happen!

P/S If anyone's wondering how?

You can read about it in my blogs.

Original! I took care of everything, but didn't bother to lawyour expert adequately.

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

That's original! You took care of everything, but you didn't bother to lawyour expert adequately.

Why take care of the bus braking system when you can ask the passengers to brake with their heels?
 
Artyom Trishkin:
Why bother with a serviceable bus braking system when you can ask passengers to brake with their heels?

The funny thing is that you, Artyom, like Dmitry, specialise in MQL4 where the order is the "master".

Maybe you and Dimitri are not quite aware that in MQL5 the position is "queen"?

P/S For your reference (not advertising or "spreading" fingers)

I had about 15 arguments with developers on MT5

0 lost arguments.