You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Teak density:
Teak flux density:
Yeah, not bad either. by the way, i read above that possible price direction is lost. i have to argue - no it is not. add up the difference of neighbouring ticks in pure form.
I don't quite understand. Suggests summing and then averaging (oscillator, EMA)?
I don't quite understand. Suggests summing and then averaging (oscillator, EMA)?
Do not average by any means. You are only interested in the sign of the sum and its strength, i.e. the numerical value.
But you still have to charge for a gap. They are so fidgety - one up, one down.
still get either + or -. yes, save for the same period of time, which must then be subjected to optimisation.
There's something about it:
Note, the strength of the flow has changed the sign from "+" to "-".
There's something about it:
Notice the strength of the flow has changed from a "+" to a "-" sign.
perfect. that's exactly what it's supposed to do.
you have two super important values for deciding on a trade.
We put three parameters under the optimiser's press - flow strength, direction of movement, time period, and ticks.
When I wrote somewhere on this forum about Ohm's law, I got ridiculed. But I meant exactly this process. And it still exists as a variant of high-frequency strategy.
perfect. that's exactly what it's supposed to do.
you have two super important values for deciding on a trade.
The three parameters you put under the optimizer's press - the strength of the flow, the direction of movement, the time period, and the ticks.
When I wrote somewhere on this forum about Ohm's law, I got ridiculed. But I meant exactly this process. And it still exists as a variant of high-frequency strategy.
The more parameters, the worse the sensitivity of the system. After all, we are always trying to react to the consequence (the level of price change) and not to the cause.