Break-even interest - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
not very interesting ...
Well, if you are a dry mathematician, not much, but if you have a spirit of research and imagination, it's all right.
By the way, your method can be used, the formula is
(Current Level - Average Position Price)*Volume of Position/Delta Levels+Original Lot
Well, if you are a dry mathematician, not much, but if you have a spirit of research and imagination, it's all right.
By the way, your method can be used, the formula is
(Current Level - Average Position Price)*Volume of Position/Delta Levels+Original Lot
why do you calculate the delta level?
the simple formula I gave you is not enough?
Why do you calculate the delta level, explain ...
The simple formula I gave you is not enough?
The simple formula in my formula isAveragePositionPrice.
The delta is necessary ... to determine how much volume should be a lot, to cover losses for a given interval of pips.
The simple formula in my formula isAverage Position Price.
Delta is needed... to determine how much lot should be used to cover the loss for a given interval of pips.
Well, my formula only makes it easier...
Like this, in the schedule it looks scary when automating a couple of lines
4th order price 1.600000 lot3 0.04 50% lot4 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2+op3*lt3-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2+aw*lt3))/(aw-op4) which is already increasing by 0.04
Order 3 price 1.57640 lot3 0.01 38.2% lot3 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2))/(aw-op3) the result is 0.016 which means we take 0.01 or 0.02, I do not remember exactly but I think it is rounded to 0.02
2 order price 1.54720 lot2 0.01 23.6% lot2 = (op1*lt1-aw*lt1)/(aw-op2) result is less than 0.01, so we will take 0.01
1 order a price of 1.500000 lot1 0.01 0 %
That to receive profit that to result on a lot it is necessary to add the minimum lot since 3 orders, up to this point on the formula there will be a profit as a result of taking the standard minimum lot.
You can recalculate manually:
лот4 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2+op3*lt3-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2+aw*lt3))/(aw-op4)
лот4 = (1,50000*0,01+1,54720*0,01+1,57640*0,01-(1,57640*0,01+1,57640*0,01+1,57640*0,01))/(1,57640-1.60000)
lot4 = 0.04
It is important to note that recalculating the formula lot4 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2+op3*lt3-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2+aw*lt3))/(aw-op4) might show a different result +/- 0.01
because after the second order for the third order we get the lot 0.016 and the program will automatically round it off since we cannot open the lot 0.016 which means that this lot will affect the lot calculation for the 4th order...
You can recalculate manually:
лот4 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2+op3*lt3-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2+aw*lt3))/(aw-op4)
лот4 = (1,50000*0,01+1,54720*0,01+1,57640*0,01-(1,57640*0,01+1,57640*0,01+1,57640*0,01))/(1,57640-1.60000)
lot4 = 0.04
It is important to note that if you recalculate the formula lot4 = (op1*lt1+op2*lt2+op3*lt3-(aw*lt1+aw*lt2+aw*lt3))/(aw-op4) manually, you may get a different result +/- 0.01
because after the second order for the third order we get the lot 0.016 and the program will automatically round it off since we cannot open the lot 0.016 which means that this lot will affect the lot calculation for the 4th order...
The result of 0.4 does not add up to 0.05 (5.24) - who got the calculations wrong?
It is logically difficult to understand what kind of action you are doing with numbers...
According to our conditions, we do not have an opening at 1.5 - we open with 1.5472.
Checked the calculations through the code, so you're wrong...
So the error is not in the maths, it's in the logic ...