Moderation in the marketplace - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"smiley face - holding my head."
Buy anything without reading the instructions? That's too much of a luxury to allow! FREE versions - maybe they are. Try it, it doesn't work, then read the manual.
Well, if you've bought one and haven't read the manual and nothing works, you should go back and read the manual and recommendations, and then make your claims and ask questions!
Why this strange reasoning? One and the same indicator may be interpreted by each user differently - "to" or "from", to "bounce" or "breakout", etc.
Or do you think that the buyer pays money for a picture of the indicator without even going into the essence of what is written?
The indicator has not appeared on the chart, but it "drew" a message in the journal that certain quotes are missing, which the moderator has not even paid attention to!
At least it was written in black and white in the instruction, verbatim: "Make sure that all 28 currency pairs containing 8 currencies (USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, CAD, AUD, NZD, JPY) are present in the Market Watch window".
I think the answer "the indicator doesn't draw" is useless, uninformative and not correct! I, like everyone here, am not a psychic!
Notifications are written in the log mainly for developers, not for users, users read the information mainly from the main window and they do not have to be psychics and look where the log or expert events are.
If a certain quote is missing, the indicator should display this message in the main window and notify the user about it, because it is important information, not to write in the middle of nowhere
What did the moderator tell me that I didn't understand? And you shouldn't judge someone who is incompetent by his own judgement! It does not suit you.
Alternatively -- you could get offended at everyone -- the moderator is bad incompetent -- the forumers who don't agree with you don't understand anything.
The result is there and it hasn't changed yet -- your product isn't published.
So that's how it is? Really? In my opinion, this means only one thing - the moderator is not competent and before testing he didn't even bother to read the recommendations, the description of what is required for the correct operation of the indicator, namely, the presence of 28 currency pairs!
Why this strange reasoning? One and the same indicator may be interpreted by each user differently - "to" or "from", to "bounce" or "breakout", etc.
Or do you think that the buyer pays money for a picture of the indicator without even going into the essence of what is written?
The indicator has not appeared on the chart, but it "drew" a message in the journal that certain quotes are missing, which the moderator has not even paid attention to!
At least it was written in black and white in the instructions, verbatim: "Make sure that all 28 currency pairs containing 8 currencies (USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, CAD, AUD, NZD, JPY) are present in the Market Watch window".
I think the answer "the indicator doesn't draw" is useless, uninformative and not correct! I, like everyone here, am not a psychic!
You've got a lot of nerve. So many people have already said roughly the same thing...
Look at all these recommendations from another perspective: the more the software tells the user yourself, the less users will pester you with "dumb" questions. The manual is the last thing to read. At best, most will read a general description of the program. And they are more likely to ask you questions, because it's easier that way. Why would you waste your precious time answering the same questions over and over again (even if the answer is a crude "RTFM")? Time spent on intelligent design of the mechanisms of communication between the program and the user and their implementation will ultimately prove to be much less.
And isn't it a cool challenge to one's programming beginnings? To write a program which embraces the "stupidity" of users to the maximum? Isn't it the romance of the craft, isn't it the chance to make this damn imperfect world a bit "right"? :)In general, I must say that sometimes comments from moderators are for the good of the product.
But for God's sake let them say what they do not like, so that the seller could take effective measures, otherwise it turns out that we all have to be clairvoyants
PP By the way can not embrace all the"stupidity" of users?- it is infinite.
In general, I must say that sometimes comments from moderators are for the good of the product.
But for God's sake let them say what they do not like, so that the seller could take effective measures, otherwise it turns out that we all have to be clairvoyants
In general, I must say that sometimes comments from moderators are for the good of the product.
But for God's sake let them say what they do not like, so that the seller could take effective measures, otherwise it turns out that we all have to be clairvoyants.
At least you moderator said that it does not draw anything, as I understand it, nothing, no information of the indicator, no warnings of errors, etc. How can a moderator guess what your problem is, please explain?
As you can see he put the indicator on the chart, but nothing has been drawn, how would he know what the problem is or what he should write to you? You should put yourself in the moderator's shoes, you have run the program with no results, what would you write to the programmer?
The funny thing is he doesn't want to be a psychic and we just have to be.
Who, I don't want to bea psychic!?
I really want to bea psychic, but sometimes I just can't.
Can you tell me how it works for you?
Is it working?