You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Generally speaking, if you follow this principle, it is possible to create some kind of pattern. I once built binary patterns by separating parts from each other with a zigzag.
You can make such a slicing on each timeframe, and then select the ones that repeat on all of them. Identify the probability of their formation.
And then we will dance from the current image in the market and compare it with possible patterns in the accumulated database.
Sharpening for each symbol pair.
Advice can also lead astray.
A fractal is a multiple of some basis, one way or another.
Why H1 and M1, can you explain?
Generally speaking, if you follow this principle, it is possible to create some kind of pattern. I once built binary patterns by separating parts from each other with a zigzag.
You can make such a slicing on each timeframe, and then select the ones that repeat on all of them. Identify the probability of their formation.
And then we will dance from the current image in the market and compare it with possible patterns in the accumulated database.
Sharpening for each symbol pair.
I don't understand the idea at all)), rephrase it please.
223231:
I do not understand the idea at all)), please rephrase it.
To extract "basic structures" of fractals (i.e. patterns) from the history, we take a zigzag indicator (you can also select the moving averages crossing and any combination of indicators). It divides the quotes history into these parts.
Then we define the characteristics of these parts. The methodology can be different here. It can be binary recodings of bars, indicators' relative indexes, in general, there is a field for imagination. Let us call such data quasi-cell.
We select and calculate quasi-cells for all (necessary) timeframes.
Then, we compare the resulting quasi-cells by timeframes, gathering statistics for each type of quasi-cell.
A deeper analysis can identify the transition of one type of quasi-cell to another (morphism, growth, development).
For analysis, it is easier to identify the probability of occurrence for each quasi-cell species.
This is the preparation and analysis. Then, when trading, a similar real-time analysis of the market is made and compared with the existing quasi-cells for possible formation.
During the appearance of new bars we can calculate what kind of a cell is forming at the moment (according to different timeframes), and with a reasonable probability we can say how the formation of this cell will be finished (according to the available types of cells).
Is that a little clearer?
To identify the "basic structures" of fractals (i.e. patterns) from the history, we take a zigzag indicator (you can choose the moving averages crossover and any combination of indicators). It divides the quotes history into these parts.
Then we define the characteristics of these parts. The methodology can be different here. It can be binary recodings of bars, indicators' relative indexes, in general, there is a field for imagination. Let us call such data quasi-cell.
We select and calculate quasi-cells for all (necessary) timeframes.
Then, we compare the resulting quasi-cells by timeframes, gathering statistics for each type of quasi-cell.
A deeper analysis can identify the transition of one type of quasi-cell to another (morphism, growth, development).
For analysis, it is easier to identify the probability of occurrence for each quasi-cell species.
This is the preparation and analysis. Then, when trading, a similar real-time analysis of the market is made and compared with the existing quasi-cells for possible formation.
During the appearance of new bars we can calculate what kind of a cell is forming at the moment (according to different timeframes), and with a reasonable probability we can say how the formation of this cell will be finished (according to the available types of cells).
Is that a little clearer?
To distinguish the "basic structures" of fractals (i.e. patterns) from the history, we take a zigzag indicator (you can choose the moving averages crossover and any combination of indicators). It divides the quotes history into these parts.
Then we define the characteristics of these parts. The methodology can be different here. It can be binary recodings of bars, indicators' relative indexes, in general, there is a field for imagination. Let us call such data quasi-cell.
We select and calculate quasi-cells for all (necessary) timeframes.
Then, we compare the resulting quasi-cells by timeframes, gathering statistics for each type of quasi-cell.
A deeper analysis can identify the transition of one type of quasi-cell to another (morphism, growth, development).
For analysis, it is easier to identify the probability of occurrence for each quasi-cell species.
This is the preparation and analysis. Then, when trading, a similar real-time analysis of the market is made and compared with the existing quasi-cells for possible formation.
During the appearance of new bars we can calculate what kind of a cell is forming at the moment (according to different timeframes), and with a reasonable probability we can say how the formation of this cell will be finished (according to the available types of cells).
Is that a little clearer?
Timeframes set the scaling coefficients, why on Earth should the market follow these very coefficients? Imho, it would be more correct to speak not about timeframes, but about time horizons, in general they can be arbitrary. Whether the market is divided into discrete horizons is a separate question. If so, their separation is also a separate question :).
At one time I looked closer to such a task and even made a special zigzag. But then it got stalled. And I put the zigzag on the market, for a great price :).
Timeframes set the scaling coefficients, why should the market follow these coefficients? Imho, it is more correct to speak not about timeframes, but about time horizons, in the general case they can be arbitrary. Whether the market is divided into discrete horizons is a separate question. If so, their separation is also a separate question :).
At one time I looked closer to such a task and even made a special zigzag. But then it got stalled. And I put the zigzag on the market, for a great price :).
There is such a thing as normalisation. If the patterns are normalised to a Maximum-Minimum value, the coefficients will be the same, with a margin of error.