You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The Grail is not for sale! They print their own money! As I understand it, Mr. programmer is trying to sell a pig in a poke, but at a higher price!
Dear Sir, let me put it another way, you give an advisor and get an agreed dividend from the withdrawal of profits!!!
The Grail is not for sale! They print their own money! As I understand it, Mr. programmer is trying to sell a pig in a poke, but at a higher price!
Dear Sir, let me put it another way, you give an advisor and get an agreed dividend from the withdrawal of profits!!!
That's an interesting approach. For example, I can give a normal bot on condition that the trader pays 25% of the profit every month))). But also on the condition that the Expert Advisor will be on my VPS.
And how much will you compensate for the loss?)))
And from the loss how much will you compensate?)))
The losses are all yours, I'm not greedy ))))
No go - it's to a therapist)))
I can even say with certainty that in this case the proger becomes the slave of the investor. I.e. the proger will have to answer in any case. This is the consensus.
If a broker can compensate for depo losses of a trader-investor, he would probably not look for investors. For example, progerger is looking for an investor with the amount of $ 10000, but the investor comes and says, "You must guarantee my deposit, i.e. you must also have $ 10000 + my nervous stress and moral stress. Then what difference does it make to the trader to use his own insurance deposit or investor's deposit? I think there is no profit to be made from using investor's deposit. I can even say with certainty that in this case, the proger becomes the slave of investor. In any case, the proger will have to answer. This is the consensus.
As for the fact that the signals service is a championship in itself - this is only partially true, because the service pulls the old account history on which you don't know how you traded, and often provides nice statistics in this way. For a fair comparison of signals in the Championship mode, the statistics must be calculated from the moment of signal registration, not from the account opening. Or, alternatively, make a separate rating for the signals, for which new accounts were opened without any backstory. That would be transparent.