Why have subscriptions been banned on the grounds of "too high a yield" ? - page 59

 

And what were you doing on the Fora before that?

ZS: In the near future nothing will change everything will be as before, this is not a bug MT, MKs know about it, so need kitchens. )

 
papaklass:

It is a bit strange that no one from MetaQuotes has reacted to the incorrect handling of limiters in their platforms.

In the platforms, SellLimit orders are executed by Bid, while they should be executed by Ask; BuyLimit orders are executed by Ask, while they should be executed by Bid.

Any comments?

SellLimit is not executed according to Ask, SellLimit forms Ask. It will only be executed if there is someone willing to buy at that Ask price.
 
Contender:
Understand that SellLimit is not "executed at Ask", SellLimit forms the Ask. It will be executed only if there is someone willing to buy at this Ask price.
And if there are no bidders, the Ask should not go higher than our SellLimit, until there are bidders, but it does go.
 
papaklass:

It is a bit strange that no one from MetaQuotes has reacted to the incorrect handling of limiters in their platforms.

In the platforms, SellLimit orders are executed by Bid, while they should be executed by Ask; BuyLimit orders are executed by Ask, while they should be executed by Bid.

Any comments?

That's not quite right. In reality, if a Ask reaches the Selllimit, it is not yet an execution (at that price there could be many "other orders" of the same type and you will not be filled).

But if a better Ask has gone above your order there is nothing to do - you have been executed.

Contender:
Understand, SellLimit is not "executed by Ask", SellLimit forms Ask. It will only be executed if there is someone willing to buy at this Ask price.

Let's put it simply without T&S,

If the best Ask is above your SellLimit you have been executed

sanyooooook:
and if there are no willing buyers then the Ask should not go above our Sellimit until willing buyers show up, but it's still going.
Where in the kitchens or the real market?
 
olyakish:
Where in the kitchens or in the real market?
In kitchens of course not on the stock exchanges
 
Rann:

A limit is a limit, it has a guaranteed price but not a guaranteed execution. If you send a limit already in the market (e.g. a sell limit below the market), it will be a stop limit.

All of this is possible and works. And it works for us in MT4. It would be good if Renat would refine the orders and add normal stop limits (like on the exchange).

There's no need for any stop-limits. Any limit which is worse than the current price is a stop limit. Its slippage will be limited by the price specified in it.
Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Торговые константы / Свойства ордеров
Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Торговые константы / Свойства ордеров
  • www.mql5.com
Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Торговые константы / Свойства ордеров - Документация по MQL5
 
papaklass:

In forex, SellLimit orders are executed at Bid (Ask, of course, is higher) and BuyLimit orders are executed at Ask (Bid, of course, is lower). So we rebel. :)

Your claim in the current wording is not correct. The fact that SellLimit is executed by Bid, while BuyLimit is executed by Ask is correct and is beyond any doubt. But the fact that the limit orders you put out do not change the current Bid and Ask, even if the bid prices are better than Bid/Ask prices is really suggestive and requires a response from those DCs who practice such behavior.

_________

* Although if you use limit bids, you are sort of a liquidity provider. Your bid is present in the cup. The liquidity consumer, who is hitting the market, sees your bid and agrees to your price. When he buys from you, the Last price becomes equal to your bid, and the trade is executed; the Bid remains the same, so you have sold at Ask and bought at Bid, only the Ask and Bid prices are your own bid prices.

 
papaklass:

It is a bit strange that no one from MetaQuotes has reacted to the incorrect handling of limiters in their platforms.

In the platforms, SellLimit orders are executed by Bid, while they should be executed by Ask; BuyLimit orders are executed by Ask, while they should be executed by Bid.

Any comments?

i.e. we set both BuyLimit and SellLimit at the same time and take the spread from the brokerage company?)

 

In markets with a tumbler, only marques buy at Asku and sell at Bid. And that depends on the volume of the gangs and the market. Limits are executed when they get the best and someone sends a counter-market.

It's like a collective farm market)) The gourds are sitting with potatoes for sale - each one has a table of costs. The women form a glass and have limited bids. A buyer comes (market order) and chooses the grandmother with the lowest price. If a headstock has less potatoes than it needs, it buys the remaining potatoes from the next headstock with the lowest price. This results in slippage, which causes the price to change.

If there are no buyers, no deals will be made and the dough will sit with potatoes.) If there is no dough, there will be no deals, even if there are buyers. I.e. a deal always happens between someone's market and someone else's limit price, but when the turn comes (it has become the best price). And the price only changes when a new trade at a different price than the previous one occurs. The price is Last (last)

 
Avals:

It's like at the central market)) The women are sitting there with potatoes for sale - each one has a price tag. The women form a glass and have limited bids. A buyer comes (market order) and chooses the grandmother with the lowest price. If a headstock has less potatoes than it needs, it buys the remaining potatoes from the next headstock with the lowest price. There is slippage, which causes the price to change.

You have bought a potato, but your policeman comes up to you and takes it away because you haven't bought it at the market price. :) just kidding.