Why have subscriptions been banned on the grounds of "too high a yield" ? - page 26
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's where the sadness and degradation began.
How to live ...
Top 10 largest forex market makers :
This is who I pay)
The more murky it is, the more people go for it).
I dread to think of your generation succeeding ours.
Exceptions like AndrewTheXpert will be in demand...
And you'll be digging from pole to pole.
While the theme (spread trading) and the EA raises many questions and is instructive in many, quite mundane aspects.
For example:
1. is the spread an "enemy" or a "friend"?
...I believe in paying the spread to the liquidity provider.
// the suppliers of your opinions apparently too ... ;)
Yes, but the liquidity provider assumes the risk and loss of non-flat movements which occur from time to time.
Liquidity providers benefit from a flat within certain limits, while market makers benefit from a momentum/trend and preferably with minimal pullbacks. Where some lose, others gain. And without each other, they are not interested in each other)) Liquidity providers and all other range providers need market traders. If they are few or many liquidity providers, the competition between them starts. The result is the narrowing of the spread and the trading range in general. Along with the magnitude of fluctuations their profits will decrease, and the risk of a sudden stop-out will remain. And vice versa, if there are few futures and many marques, the latter lose on slippage. All in all, a dialectical pair))
imha, trading ranges on FX is profitable, but not at spread levels - this is the field of prof. participants and it is difficult to compete with them (if not on the demo of course :) ). Of course the idea to place limits on a point better than large providers and at the cost of their large orders will provide variation and profit (in fact MM frontrunning) is attractive, but in reality they are not so simple, more informed, have a shorter execution time and overhead, so that you run in and those orders are already gone)).
http://www.forexcup.com/russian_championship_ru.html - here's an interesting one, by the way, will we see some familiar nicknames here...
http://www.forexcup.com/russian_championship_ru.html - here's an interesting one, by the way, will we see some familiar nicknames here...
It says in the Terms and Conditions - Expert Advisors are allowed
And in the rules it is written - Prohibited automated strategies that do not require participation of a trader (unless otherwise defined by special conditions of competition).
Unclear
two accounts. on one ECN broker.
on the same account (acceptor) PriceGiver and EXP_Relogin
on the second one (donor with big money) PriceTaker
Can I see the balance graph of the donor?
Does the donor work on a real account?
Can I see a graph of the donor's balance?
Is the donor in a real account working?
I do not understand the question. In this case, the donor works, of course, on the second demo account. On the real ... well, technically it could work, of course, but the point? To drain the money?
Well, let's put it this way. We may benefit a lot from this experiment. But if you are interested in the exchange of money between accounts - it is exactly the thing, that neither I nor hrenfx want to contribute to, but on the contrary.
The question is not addressed to me and not to the author of the Expert Advisor. Please do not disturb us on these occasions, neither on the forum nor by forum.
Yes, but the liquidity provider assumes the risk and loss of non-flat movements that occur from time to time.
Liquidity providers benefit from a certain amount of flatness, while market makers benefit from momentum/trends and preferably with minimal pullbacks. Where some lose, others gain. And without each other, they are not interested in each other)) Liquidity providers and all other range providers need market traders. If they are few or many liquidity providers, the competition between them starts. The result is the narrowing of the spread and the trading range in general. Along with the magnitude of fluctuations their profits will decrease, and the risk of a sudden stop-out will remain. And vice versa, if there are few futures and many marques, the latter lose on slippage. All in all, a dialectical pair))
imha, trading ranges on FX is profitable, but not at spread levels - this is the field of prof. participants and it is difficult to compete with them (if not on the demo of course :) ). Of course the idea to place limits by a point better than the big providers and due to their big orders a swing and profit will be provided (practically MM frontrunning), but in reality they are not so easy, more informed, have a shorter execution time and overhead, you will run in and those orders are already gone))
Everything is correct.
True, this is not a reason to crawl under the sofa and be afraid... :)