Norm? - page 23
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
you're not a "Copenhagenist" at all... - google requotes, google spikes and spreads, sync history with the server, etc. ....
and to manage your terminal or your operating system - think about it, who needs it when there are so many tools available to brokers, and all these tools are not necessarily machinations of a broker - this is how the market has always worked
You should not listen to the advice of others, I have told you - you are at the beginning and have no idea how much you need to go to understand where there is profit in the market and where the chance, but you do not want to read, do not use the search and shout about machinations of brokerage companies or blame the freemasons ))))).
SZS: knock to your broker's support, and before you knock in your computer search for folders with terminal logs - in more than half the cases the fault on your side
a request to the market moderators
I've read in the EA moderation description that MQ is using its own way of testing with quotes shifting. Can I see a picture of the last three years of my owl on GMT+6 for example? I myself raced in GMT+2 and the fact that the EA makes profit and does not lose money in conditions different from real ones was a nice indication for me.
Where did you read that?
Alexx, and I also read that the EA is encrypted by the server as soon as it is uploaded for checking. Is it true?
In general, the dependence of FS on money management is an issue that is poorly researched.
Well, yes, MQ has nothing but thoughts to decompile another grail. And not just to decompile, but also to understand the logic. That's a huge team of intellectuals...
You dig shallow.
You don't dig very deep, you're not a Copenhagen... - google requotes,google spikes and spreads,sync history with the server,etc....
and to manage your terminal or your operating system - think about it, who needs it when there are so many tools available to brokers, and all these tools are not necessarily machinations of a broker - this is how the market has always worked
You should not listen to the advice of others, I have told you - you are at the beginning and have no idea how much you need to go to understand where there is profit in the market and where the chance, but you do not want to read, do not use the search and shout about machinations of brokerage companies or blame the freemasons ))))).
SZS: knock to your broker's support, and before you knock in your computer search for terminal folders with logs - in more than half the cases the fault is on your side
If you look at the market makers, brokerage companies and software developers (adaptation for a certain brokerage company), it is abnormal when someone is successful in searching for approximation logics of price. Naturally, no one will bother with small fish, and why? But if a "sucker" miraculously manages to keep high profit even after requotes, spreads, etc., the trading robot is sent to the brokerage company server where it is decompiled, logic is restored and all sorts of tricks are developed and implemented. I think everyone may put himself in place of DC thinkers and think that they would do exactly the same.
Therefore, the Grail should work on a separate MT in a secure location in the demo, and the Expert Advisor in the MT folder of your brokerage company only reads data generated by it (by the Grail). There is no question about selling Grails, it's naive. You can sell either plummers, or templates and technical parts.
Well, yes, MQ has nothing but thoughts to decompile another grail. And not just to decompile, but also to understand the logic. What a huge team of intellectuals is needed...
You're digging too shallow.
And why bother, there are systems that filter by excellent results (well, there will be 10 systems per month at weekends) the smoothness of the equity graph. If we want profitability of 100% at 5% risk, we may do it once a week (just for a hobby), especially considering that there should only be one idea (since the sought-after equity line is straight, there should not be many of them), but in different interpretations.
There are two ideas:
1) flat: buy cheap, sell expensive;
2) trend: buy expensive, sell even more expensive (sell cheap, buy even cheaper).
stop making things up, no one is downloading anything - can you confirm it? it is not that hard to knock the logic of an expert by legal means
SZS: I do not know how people do it, but I remember reading Mr. Rann's posts from alps where he answered to such nonsense that it is more profitable to copy trades of a successful trader than to hinder him - and it is more expensive and many successful traders agree to open PAMM - this is additional turnover. If you are able to prove in practice that you or your trading robot can earn, you will receive a phone call or an email with attractive offers.