You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Going back to the forum topic (let me remind you, "Who is ready to pay how much for a really profitable signal"), I think it would be more correct to consider the signal fee as a percentage of the profit obtained from the signal. I propose to discuss such a scheme, to identify its pros and cons.
First of all, it's not feasible.
We can actually stop there.
First of all, it's not feasible.
We can actually stop there.
Justify!
You are the source of signals, I am the receiver (buyer)
You want me to pay you a % of the profit at the end of the month
First, it is only through giving you the investment password, this number will not work
If it works, I will give you the investment and you will appreciate my turning over a deposit of 100 quid, or any minimum deposit if you set a minimum deposit (turnover).
But this account will not be related to the other, which will be copied from the first one on my same computer but with the deposit I wanted
You are the source of signals, I am the receiver (buyer)
You want me to pay you a % of the profit at the end of the month
First, it is only through giving you the investment password, this would not work
If it works, I will give you the investment and you will appreciate my turning over a deposit of 100 quid, or any minimum deposit if you set a minimum deposit (turnover).
But this account will not be related to the other, which will be copied from the first one on my same computer but with the deposit I want
So, the important parameter here will be the average number of points the seller can earn during a certain period! The seller's history can clearly trace the overall picture and the average daily or weekly income of manager can be in pips!
First of all, it's not realizable.
Realizable. But
1. very unreliable. When to charge -- after? The fee is taken from the account. who guarantees that the right amount is there?
2. It is stupid. You only need to copy money from your account to another one and then not pay anything at all.
In short, screw it.
Justify!!!
Above.
Realizable. But
1. very unreliable. When to charge -- after? The fee is taken from the account. who guarantees that the right amount is there?
2. it is stupid. you only need to copy from your account to another one and then you will not pay anything.
In short, screw it.
Above.
Not sure how "realisable" fits in with the impossibility of copy protection that we both said