Suggestions, comments, errors on the Signals service - page 51
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It makes sense that they are already divided by lot size).
I'm confused by the comma after "Logically" )
ZS: points per lot? )
30 pp with 1 lot =30 pp\lot ))
No, that's not it.
i see it as adding up points for all trades and dividing by the number of trades
I'm confused by the comma after "Logically" )
100%
shockingly - it was a thoughtless adherence to the rules (tradition?) of punctuation // "before what - always a comma"
for me personally, I always use commas according to their meaning. I discovered long ago that this rule-based arrangement leads to communication difficulties.
I'm confused by the comma after "Logically" )
ZS: points per lot? )
Maybe we should look at a parameter such as how much $ per trade on average, rather than pips per trade.
How else? If we're calculating the number of pips in a deal, we should also divide it by the lot. The price passed so-and-so pips, I took them and the lot is not important.) The point value itself is not regulated properly.)
You said it yourself: "how many pips per trade" )
i.e. the number of pips from one trade, in order to find an average of two trades, add up the pips and divide by 2.
You said it yourself: "how many pips per trade" )
i.e. the number of pips from one trade, in order to find the average of two trades, add up the pips and divide by 2.
Well, even if the lot is not taken into account, if the trades overlap in time, it's not two trades, but one).
arbitrage opens several trades at the same time )
at the same time, but they are different trades
Even if lot is not taken into account, if the trades overlap in time, it is not two trades, but one).
arbitrage opens several trades at the same time )
at the same time, but they are different trades