Market: How will situations of product failure be handled after a build update ? - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here it is possible to solve the problem in this way (albeit partially):
MQ gives the developers a special "developer certificate" status. Then, for example, a new build is scheduled to be released on the 20th. Five working days before release this very build is given to the certificate holder. Developers test their product with the new build for 5 working days fixing bugs and writing feedback. If there is too much negative feedback or the new build affects critical products MQ will delay release of the new build for at least 5 days. During this time, MQ and the developers actively adjust their products to each other (the MQ <=> Developers interaction is obviously important here) and as a result of their mutual efforts all commercially active products are working by the public release of the new build.
Complicated as it is, there's a long-established working scheme.
Developers of plugins and add-ons for various products are able to use the beta version for testing. Without certificates of course, in free access.
So, there is a beta branch with its own updates. No one is waiting for anyone. As it is now practically.
Stable updates will be less, since there are practically no situations when it's necessary to urgently fix a bug that popped up. Naturally, minor updates, which will not affect anything that works, may be published. In the marketplace, products working on the stable version. When you change stable version - either become unavailable, or marked as obsolete (although it is wrong to charge for them imho).
For methaqvot it is the introduction of one more beta point. The terminal will continue to auto-update, but only with stable releases.
Question for you:
If anyone has a product that actually makes money in real money, or can they use it (the product) to make money in real money? And is the owner of this product ready to put it on the market?
Not necessary for a tester.
Bazinga :)))
It's normal, Russian business, now they will strike hands and one will start writing an advisor and the other will look for a lemon to pay for it.
It's even easier to boggle for free, it won't make your mouth sweeter, but there is no loss.
You don't have to, you haven't earned a "million" to buy, you can deduct a percentage of the profit.
It is even easier to make a buck for free, it does not make your mouth sweeter, but there is no loss.
Why give a percentage of profits if the seller can trade on his own and not give anything to anyone.
Oh yes, there is no money for the deposit.
It's even easier to boggle for free, it won't make your mouth water, but it won't do you any good.
Why give a percentage of profit if the seller can trade on his own and not give anything to anyone.
Oh yes, there is no money for the deposit.
Although, judging by your remarks, this rule is hardly relevant for you, for there is another observation from life: "he who has nothing to lose laughs well".
The golden rule of business: "as soon as you say that you have enough money and do not need more, your capital begins to dwindle".
Although, judging by your remarks, this rule is hardly relevant for you, for there is another observation from life: "he who has nothing to lose laughs well".
I work as a janitor. But I've been laughing at you all day.