Real PR (performance rating) of the processors to be tested - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Sony Vaio VPCEB3B4R laptop (4GB DDR3-1066, Win7 64-bit, MT5 64-bit):
Core i3-370M @ 2.40GHz, 3950 MB, PR55
2011.01.08 18:20:49 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 7143131 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 16225 ms (total bars in history 576660, total time 16303 ms)
Profit -404.65
I came across a computer with an Intel processor from the new series.
WIN7-x64 MT5 64-bit
Intel Core i5-2400 Sandy Bridge 3.1GHz 4004 MB, PR113
2011.03.15 19:41:15 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 7143131 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 11295 ms (total bars in history 576660, total time 11357 ms)
Table on 4th page
I came across a computer with an Intel processor from the new series.
WIN7-x64 MT5 64-bit
Intel Core i5-2400 Sandy Bridge 3.1GHz 4004 MB, PR113
2011.03.15 19:41:15 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 7143131 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 11295 ms (total bars in history 576660, total time 11357 ms)
The table on page 4
I do not understand it: a whole branch, quite large, but nobody has ever suggested to measure not only history generation time but also the main thing - optimization time of the same Expert Advisor on different processors/machines. I'm going to buy a new computer, so why should I measure the generation time of ticks? I do not want to take it seriously. I understand that it correlates well, but the tasks are different anyway. One thing is to generate a history, and another thing is to calculate and make deals on this history.
So there is something here, but it is also missing something essential...
Maybe we should test it one more time? Only the criteria should be discussed and approved first!
??