Alternatively:
And this is not taken into account in the calculation.
PR will be higher in the x32 terminal than in the x64 terminal.
strange. everyone has a different number of simulated ticks. but the number of bars is the same. i wonder if the reports are the same ?
Net profit: - 404.65 Total profit: 1,781.53 Total loss: -2,186.18
Files:
ReportTester-661861.rar
73 kb
Prival:
Yes, my results are the same to the penny, although the number of ticks is 15 more than yours.
strange. everyone has a different number of simulated ticks. but the number of bars is the same. i wonder if the reports are the same ?
Net profit: - 404.65 Total profit: 1,781.53 Total loss: -2,186.18
Batter has beaten everyone again ))) (memory is less, winds seem to be "worse", processor is a bit cooler, but not that much) and the time is minimal. I wonder if anyone has E8500 or E8600 please post the results
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have noticed that PR calculated by the tester does not reflect the real situation. Particularly, Intel T2400 shows PR56 on one core and PR70 on the other, while AMD Opteron 6128 shows PR25 to PR49 on different cores. It would seem that the former should be ahead of the latter. In reality, my Expert Advisor has a 50% advantage over the latter! The latter has a smaller but comparatively big advantage, about 15% on MACD.
I suggest to publish the results of testing MACD Sample with default parameters on EURUSD M1 history 2010.01.01-2010.08.01.
For the sake of purity of the experiment, log out of the terminal before testing, then log in again.
Give the name of the processor as it is shown in the Agents tab and the line with the test result from the Journal.
Here are my two results:
Processor: Intel T2400 @ 1.83GHz, 3062MB, PR70
EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 26468 ms (total bars in history 576660)
Time: 26.5 seconds
Processor: AMD Opteron 6128, 9598MB, PR49
EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 22745 ms (total bars in history 576660)
Time: 22.7 seconds
We see that the time of the first one (26.5 sec) is 15% worse than the second one (22.7 sec), though the PR of the first one is 70, and that of the second one is 49.